Search results

the printing on the back looks off

But it's likely to be the other way around so why fall into the trap.

and this is nothing like "falling in behind said power" All they have said is don't pictured at a picket as that will be on the front of the Sun etc and used to justified why they are "Labour's strikes" The Labour party people seem to want on here is never going to win an election

We are the Ann makes a nonsense thread stage of the pre-season

it's the 6th form debating society style of party some seem to want. you can't do anything when you're not in power

It's not a great luck but the vast majority of people will never now unless the allow the tories to ramp it up Sadly politics in 2022 is largely not falling into traps set down by a government that can't govern anymore and can only try and stoke a culture war as their only hope.

This pretty much, it just gives the tories a chance to drill home their "Labour's Strikes". As the child of an RMT member I support the RMT and their actions but at the same time it would be madness to fall in to the trap the tories want to set.

As some who watches scottish football he is pretty ropey

schapps is so bad, he has 1 easy job and he's making a pigs ear of it

the new richard duffy

the right wage would be him paying us he's totally past it

Moore is a pretty good keeper and it should be on of the last places we are looking at this summer Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

seen the polls?

Bit shocking if Reeves has not even told the elected council leaders

yeah but the article implies it was ccfc that the council bailed out

andy street does like to be seen as a riding to the rescue

that was to acl and not ccfc though who apart from a rental agreement were separate

wow

tories on the vote of the mayor as it is 4 each

Also oe of the "ITK's" said it was currently mostly guess work on their behalf anyway