These seem to be a lot of hurdles other players don’t have to jump, while falling at the “are they any good and in decent form” one which I’d argue is more important.
Now you’re making a whole new argument. Your entire point rests on Sisu being out saviours and now it’s “oh maybe we’d have been worse with someone else”.
And a few pies are not the difference between a successful club or not. Even Sisu have said that several times right from the Ranson days...
People need to stop thinking like CCFC fans first on this when asking why people whose legal duty and literal job is not CCFC. The only people legally required to put CCFC first above all else are it’s owners. Which has been my point on here for almost a decade now.
Yes. As much as we like to wail about it, on its face it was a golden opportunity to not end up with an empty arena and to bring a major sporting franchise to the city. These are good things from the councils perspective. That’s why every councillor voted for it.
This is entirely hypothetical though. Very few clubs our size just disappear. The vast majority on that list I posted are fine. Just naming the one case that did go pop doesn’t prove anything.
Do you think businesses are happy for people to broadcast discussions with them?
In both cases the council had a problem and an acceptable solution presented itself. In Wasps case a use for the bowl and promised investment, in Ashley’s also investment into the city. Despite our protestations...
Dunno if accurate but saw a comment it was the best midterms for an incumbent since Bush in 2002, right in the middle of 9/11 rally round the flag mania.