Search results

Per annum, so basically 3850 per "week" is 200k a year. That doesn't buy you much in the current market

yes, it does. It may have a typo but the general idea is a very simple one.

Why? It's a position of need for not a large fee. What else do you suggest we do? We need a new AM, what is your plan then?

It's in plain English, not my fault you are thick. Also didn't you make a big song and dance about blocking me? Wow, so you are both thick as shit and a liar. Chins up mate

Patterson is a good enough player who isn't going to cost a fortune. Yes he's not O'Hare but O'Hare isn't going to be around again fora long while. There's loads of things we can complain about but buying a player to fill an actual need isn't one of them

Yeah and a squad of them wouldn't be good enough

200k pa is about 3850 per year, what do some people think footballers good enough for the Championship earn?

It's a really weird flex to compare Waghorn and Patterson It's fucking weird as well that some people after crying about us needing more players are upset with the idea of us signing for a reasonable fee a decent player in a position we need

cool story bro

He's the clown who wants us o sign that lump from Solihull

Sunday session?

Deserved a draw in a game i expected nothing from

Yeah, yeah ;) Is that someone on the old dog and bone for you?

didn't he play the ball in to palmer when he skied it from yards right at the end?

i'm not expecting any fireworks just yet

they also want that french lad from leipzig as well who is another similar player their owner doesn't really have a plan or a clue

on a player they have a few like as well

to be fair to armstrong the previous manager did play him wide a fair few times

if say it then it must be true

If we loan a cb we can if needed play a back 5 of all loan players