Search results

I know exactly what is going on because I hear people talking in their own language before the right wing Brexit press distorts it.

You even get a like from someone who links National Socialist web sites. You are the so called democrat. Martin Schultz wants more democracy. You try to twist a request for more democracy into a dictatorship.

You keep confirming what I am saying. What is your point?

Schulz did not say „Brussels will govern Europe“... the Telegraph did. „Brussels“ is a red flag for leavers. That’s why they said it. Schultz is talking about The EU Parliament and a Second Chamber to increase the power of people in Europe who can vote representatives in or out of power. It is...

All the leave „democrats“ on major panic now that someone suggests a democratic federal government of theEU. Why? Because the populists who claim to know what the silent majority want will probably be shown up as in Germany? Or because the Tories benefit from the FPP British system? Or are...

You are quoting the Telegraph. Bear in mind that they are anti EU. They say Brussels. They mean a parliament elected by the peoiple of the EU situated in Brussels and a second chamber consisting of memeber countries representatives.

Exactly. And the government is: the EU Parliament of elected representatives and a second chamber of member government representatives voting on a majority basis.

The part that says the EU Parliament of elected MEPs gets more powers and that second chamber operates on a majority vote system. You don’t get democracy do you?

I do. And I understand the meaning of the silent majority. In Germany: It is 87,5% didn’t vote extreme right, only 12,5% did when they were given the opportunity to speak up. And that is despite racist, National Socialist propaganda alternative news sites.

The people’s representatives deciding as opposed to individual countries opting out is more democratic. No one is losing their right to vote. It is majority voting as opposed to countries voting. If you are in a minority, then your vote doesn’t count, as you keep reminding me. That is not losing...

Yes. That is correct. We agree on that.

Mandatory or not, it was sold as an advisory referendum.

No. It is about replacing the commission with a real government. The EU Parliament and a second chamber made up of countries‘ representatives - as in the German federal system. If they don’t agree to what is, in effect, more democracy, then they automatically leave. This abolishes veto rights...

Schulz’ Vision: Time for a European government As he says the European Parliament plus a second chamber made up of representatives of countries. That is without veto and with majority voting as in the German Federal System. Which is more democratic than our two chamber system- but you call it a...

Yes it is a catastrophe. As I said, and I also said they would join together, but the FDP surprised everyone. And it is still hasn’t been decided if there will be a coalition with the SPD. I didn’t say the AfD was insignificant. 12,5% against 87,5% puts it in perspective though. I said they...

I have never said anything else. I said imo it was a mistake and that we should never have made this decision based on an advisory referendum. The country is leaving despite it being only an advisory referendum on a voluntary basis.

He wants to do away with veto and replace it with majority voting- which is what you want as you are against vetos from small countries. Merkel‘s Party has other priorities. Immigration, families of refugees, integration. Söder from the CSU who will be the next leader of CSU is right wing and...

The UK are leaving voluntarily. I have always said that. Someone else denied it, not me. Stop making things up. No one wants the AfD to be the opposition party. But, seeing as the FDP walked out of the coalition talks, it may yet happen. How have I changed my opinion? Ask the FDP why they...

Having a say means deciding if they accept majority voting. How does majority voting mean that one country rules?

The British people apparently.