Search results

Good job it wasn't a foreigner in USA, they wouldn't have evn had a retrial

Well as Thorn is the best manager that we have had since we went down, should be no problem.

Somebody was convicted though weren't they? Some African guy?

Outside of the local area we are complete nobodies. We were nobodies in the Premiership, we're nobodies in the Championship and we would be barely noticed in League 1. Even less chance of attracting players. League 2 would follow and perhaps worse.

would love to be able to argue against this but I can't! especially those last 4

Of course its something to do with Thorn. He's the manager. If its nothing to do with the manager lets not have one at all, save more money! It is mostly to do with lack of investment but AT is not getting the most out of what he has got. If the team is really that bad then why does everyone...

care about it enough to lose money is the question

if nothing changes based on 7pt in 10 games its down we go

to me it would need an almost immediate investment (substancial) from someone who didn't mind losing money in the short/medium term. My hunch is that Hoffmans consortium would not have been to disimilar to SISU. Can't see that they would have been happy to chuck money at it with no return.

Scenario is (unlikely) they just get fed up with it take the hit and go

for an ignoramus like myself can someone paint a picture of the next few days, months after SISU left if they did so tomorrow. How would it work? Who would pay players? Organise matchdays etc. No axe to grind just interests me really want some opinions ideas so starting fresh post...

Yes I know, it was a piece of dazzling humour. Different seasons though sadly. ] Expected that result. Unfortunately you have to take your chances when you can (Reading, Blackpool) because a bad performance is always around the corner

point slightly missed. I too see absolutely no point in making a change. I am saying that because a large amount of people are blaming SISU for everything that happens them AT does not seem responsible in anyway for anything. He could switch to 1-2-7 at 1-0 up with 2 minutes to go and it would...

possibly but I've heard it said enough times. I guess what I'm saying is if we are never going to blame the manager for anything then whats the point in having one!

my question is this. A lot of posters have said that we are only 1 or 2 players from being a mid table side. It follows that we must have some decent players already. Therefore surely with the position we are in we are underforming and so the manager must be culpable to a certain degree

honest and brave post. I think if we had owners that we were happy with and they appointed Thorn we would be asking serious questions. Nothing whatsoever against Thorn the man. However he is in a position where there is so much distraction with the animosity towards SISU that he is seemingly...

for an ignoramus like myself can someone paint a picture of the next few days, months after SISU left if they did so tomorrow. How would it work? Who would pay players? Organise matchdays etc. No axe to grind just interests me

Forget the ownership issues and ask whether AT is getting the most out of that team. I'm not sure he is. However it is early days still

9 from 11? Have i missed something?

3 oclock on a Tuesday ain't that convenient for most people though is it with work