Search results

If some c**t can fuck something up, that c**t will pick the worst possible time to fucking fuck up because that c**t's a c**t

the behaviour is fine in block 14, nothing that doesn't happen at every ground and has happened for decades

not as long as you it seems but what i said is still true

was the current sag in place while it was just rugby at the ground?

see pete it's not just me saying this if you don't want to do it then let someone else

asking a question is not spouting off ffs, listen to yourself

you seem to be missing the point, the point is if Mark Hornby comes back to you and says Hi Pete it's a SG decision you are just going to go go ok Mark, cheers. When you should be following up asking what incident caused it and why was the decision taken if it is a massive overreaction.

Can't see it as there is enough rain forecast Friday and Saturday to take care of my ice and snow. Still, I remember that game against Lincoln where they promised it would be on, forgot that snow can drift and fucked up enough to get the game called off. What a shambles we were back in the...

Surely you can see that in a thread about likely SAG decision people will ask about your results regarding that matter. It is an issue that effects lots of fans and not just on this thread, there's been plenty of comments about the every decreasing atmosphere in the ground. it's getting worse...

Media, the Telegraph has been telling us we aren't going up. hardly a ringing endorsement that will have the crowds flocking But it's going to be fucking freezing Saturday which may put a few off.

Another graph that doesn't show that a majority of people think immigration is too high. Outside of the right wind parties and a nationalist party who probably see english folk as immigrants there is not a majority who say immigration is too high. A little tip for you, the number in the green...

Pete the actions of the SAG are it seems a big concern of the posters on the forum you represent. If you don't want to be questioned then don't started being agressive straight of the bat with people who query what seems to be a SAG decision. I know you are trying to make this about me so...

But you can question them as part of the forum. Is there a rule that you are not allowed to question decisions that the SAG has made? Genuinely what you are saying reads like you can't question SAG decisions at the forum?

What have you changed about the SAG and their long list of overreactions and the decreasing fan experience? It is legitimate to question someone who is meant to represent you, especially when they are seemingly defending what seems to be a massive overreaction. Why so touchy, we are allowed to...

In relation to the CCFC fans forum? The forum I am not a member of? the one you represent me on? the one you got shitty about being questioned over? That one?

Really, is that how you reply to appropriate questioning on your role as a representative of this forum? For the vast majority of people on here there as been no improvement in match experience and in lots of cases a regression in matchday experience. Yet you firstly come one here attacking...

So you're good at admin then. What have you actually achieved. There is nothing there that makes it better for the vast majority of people who are have their match experience ruined by the SAG and their awful decisions.

The answer answer a simple and appropriate question and stop being defensive.

Why is it a problem to you that I am asking what you have achieved in you role as a representative of me? Why so defensive? It's a legitimate question Pete, one you should be happy to answer.

What have you got changed? You represent me on that forum so I am asking you to please advise me on what you have got changed? We can't see anything that has changed.