It sounds more and more like a Monty Python sketch.
"We wish to announce that the chief whip and deputy who had earlier resigned from their posts, have, in fact, un-resigned!"
How many times do we see players with a handful of shirt and nothing gets given? All the time. So if that's ruled out for a foul, it has to be given a foul every time it happens. Where's the consistency?
I wonder. Maybe someone thought they could sneak this through on the quiet, but it got leaked and they had to call it off because they were rumbled?
Is that too cynical of me? I just don't trust that lot.
So, Duggins is saying there's no meeting, this councilor saying there is. So what the hell actually is going on!? Is Duggins trying to cover his own arse?