Search results

Don’t get me wrong I like Walsh, just felt at times he ran into trouble. His driving runs are good though

Generally find that our presence isn’t particularly bothering anyone. I get the odd bit of banter that we should be thanking them when I take the piss but generally they’re alright. I get them asking how we’re doing and checking results

Weird I also work in brum and all the blue noses are quite complimentary - enjoy a bit of banter aswell.

I appear to be the only one I thought Walsh was ok yesterday, I’d give him a 7 but I got frustrated with him running into trouble constantly. Usually a big fan of his Marosi - 8 Dabo - 7 Rose - 6 McFadzean - 8 Hyam - 6 McCallum - 6 Kelly - 8 Walsh - 7 Westbrooke - 6 Shipley - 8 Godden - 9...

Why not? palace and Wimbledon managed to play in the same league at selhurst Park. that rumour is a non event, the EFL will follow the path of least resistance

I get the feeling it’s more the telegraph pushing the question. they’re out of this fight now - like I said forget the blame game none of us are going to agree. going forward it’s between Us and a Wasps. I might email the trust and engage, might get a response, has anyone got Neil’s email...

And this issue is why we need to get it through to the trust. I might just start ringing CWR every week and drum home the indemnity point. It’s a start, ive emailed George Duggins and to be honest I find that he is quite refreshing in that he responds quite promptly. albeit the general gist...

Ignore the trust, treat them as those fans that just ramble on twitter, same as PSB Group.

Right let’s draw a line here - nobody is going to agree who’s fault it is. Let’s start the problems as of 01/01/2020 - Coventry City play at St Andrews Birmingham - Wasps who are now based in Coventry own The Ricoh Arena - a deal to return is based on Wasps dropping an indemnity clause. - The...

But that’s the frustrating part - CWR, councillors and the trust don’t focus on going forward. “We need to get wasps to drop the indemnity clause” “SISU shouldn’t have made the complaint” people are happy to argue that SISU shouldn’t have made the complaint, but don’t want to talk about the...

Didn’t richard overson confirm he left the consortium because wasps were on board?

Correct - but going forward there is one party who can change their stance... a couple of parties keep reiterating they want the the club back. We need to convince wasps to remove the clause. if there’s nothing wrong - it shouldn’t be an issue If there is a something wrong then aren’t SISU...

2bf the trust will have agreed to the indemnity clause so the club would go bust

Was that the season only them and Leicester beat us at Highfield Road?

Yeah - if on the off chance we were sold, they could still pursue the club... Bit of shithousery that the club’s supporters trust supports

Think the difference is the confidence he brings to the defence - with Burge he was always a disaster waiting to happen. the way we play out from the back is always going to lead to mistakes at this level. But when it happens for Marosi you’ll be shocked - that’s the major difference this season

Yes, correct. But wasps began negotiations in the knowledge that this happened. Besides if it was undersold then they should have to pay to difference, correct? At which point SISU would have been vindicated If as wasps and the council say it’s not - why won’t they negotiate without the clause...

Agreed - but unfortunately nobody is willing to press this. Would be interesting if something was found amiss how it would be reported

They haven’t moved out of the city.... What other option did they have other than agreeing to the indemnity clause?

Long term we want SISU to fuck off. But in that time the short term is return to Coventry. But that doesn’t mean return to any terms. Apparently club pays more rent but receives a more favourable revenue source at St. Andrews. what’s to stop Wasps offering the same deal without the indemnity...