Search results

What? They have Valentine’s Day dances for 6 year olds as well. It’s fucking weird man. Let kids be kids and stop using them as some weird adult plaything. Same as parents who dress their kids the same as them. Kids aren’t little adults you freaks.

That’s fair. Hope all works out. It’s all temporary in the end :)

Hmmm, maybe a triple signing. “Back” implies someone who has played for us before, Liam Walsh maybe? “Home” someone from Coventry, obviously Paterson “Next” implies a young prospect, perhaps from L1. Likely a CB. And then obviously Vik because he’s getting a new contract. Can’t work out...

You’re a cheery fella right now aren’t you?

Or, someone else scores. Like every other time we’ve had a forward in this system.

Godden, Walker and Eccles all expected in full training this week apparently. Fadz a few days behind so probably not for the Huddersfield game. Who would you put straight back in, if any...

The only winners are teams selling really.

Such a dumb move as well, cos the primary service is going to change. I get they’re paid to do it but still. Also the built in Netflix app is usually garbage compared to ChromeCast or whatever.

It’s an advert for the Huddersfield game…

We’ve got to really. The “model” such that it is only works if you realise your gains and reinvest. It’s why I’d sell Vik now (if anyone is actually bidding)

Luton’s losses are similar to ours when you take out big sales. If we’d sold O’Hare or Vik then we’d look the same. Can we sustain a £20m wage bill is the Q?

It doesn’t help that the parachute clubs or those with silly owners will just buy up talent for a couple of mill and stockpile them either. Panzo at Forest last season could have been ours, never played a game for them really. The CB from Oxford that went to Burnley would have been a good shout...

He was on loan before like Chaplin so I didn’t count him but yep

😬

Id imagine if we sell Hamer he’s one of the higher earners as well. Vik less likely as he’s on his original contract. The plan has to be to replace with cheaper prospects who become the next Vik/Hamer.

Im guessing a good chunk of that is the cost of U23/18s, coaches and manager (are they included?) which are likely roughly the same across the board. so once you get past that base cost the rest is first team players. A difference of £5m is 5-10 first team players, which is roughly what we’re short.

He was about the only exception but I don’t think Brown rates him. Having looked if you ignore loans I’d argue you have to go back to 09/10 when we signed Carl Baker and Richard Wood for the last time we got a player in who improved the first team at the time.

What do you mean split players? even if you expand out squad to include the kids that’s an average of over £8k a week and we’re including the likes of Harrison Nee and Tom Bilson who won’t be on anything like that. Even the Waghorn rumours are shy of £20k. If we’re spending that on wages (and...

We should have continued investing £4-5m a season in you talent like the first two seasons up. Last summer opened a huge hole in the plan by failing to sell anyone of note and not bringing in more “stock”. Really this summer the smart thing to do would be to take the hit and spend £8-10m on...

Looking at the report. It’s basically cost of living and coronavirus spending and that’s it.