Search results

If you like I'll put a bet on for Colchester to win. Given my shocking performance at betting it will almost guarantee us at least a point.

I assume you'll be championing this idea then 'for the good of the club'....?

There is a difference between killing the club and just doing things you don't like or agree with. They are culpable for some pretty poor decisions during their tenure.. But they are not alone in that regard. Your refusal to acknowledge anyone elses culpability is your choice. As a...

That's fine... So you won't need to pass comment now on all those that hate the council will you.

When your priority is hating SISU over that of supporting CCFC then you need to reassess said priorities.

Belittling them? Wouldn't hurt for 'them' to occasionally make a reasoned comment for a change... you know one that doesn't smack of 'I love hating SISU more than I do CCFC'....

About as happy as you are Tony with the council's behavior in this.

Like you're happy with stepping up to be Wasp's latest fan boy... or leaflet dropper for Lucas at the next election...

Not that I was aware of. Normal route would be through schools possibly and as I work in one I know we were never approached. Some of the kids I taught actually paid to watch CCFC as at the time the price was good and we were playing good football (before Xmas last year)

No it's long term marketing according to you.... keep up.

Fuuny how when SISU do it is not called that.....

It's easy to promise the world when you own the company that can deliver the changes. Here's a quick question.... a simple marketing and business one. Would you pay money to market a service or product that you do not control or make not one penny from?

I'm only interested in the Adams Park pitch if they have dug a hole in it to bury Anne Lucas in.....

The SISU underworld have gotten away with all this deception, obviously massively illegal and not one person thought to report it... not even anonymously. Think you might be pissing in the wind.

OK - I was more referring to the deal regarding the Ricoh, but I get your point. I believe ultimately that Wasps financial backers have no more care than ours. The bottom line is key, or they wouldn't have moved 80 miles from home.

That's the bit that plenty of people overlook. Clearly their hedgefund is better at getting stuff done than our one....but they are still just that - a hedgefund. Their overriding motive is no different to SISU's at the end of the day.

Is it now owned by the council? If so that's probably why.

I don't think 7 years ago the deal that Wasps got was ever on the table....

I said this all along in relation to the administration. When the CVA was rejected the parties that did so should have pushed for the process to be looked at in terms of legal process. If they did that - then we are in a situation where no wrong doing was found (morally - well that may be a...

Blame for this affair goes way back to the conception of the Ricoh idea if we are being honest. SISU do have a large portion of responsibility to take, as do CCC, and lots of other people.