Search results

https://www.ccfc.co.uk/news/2023/april/tickets-details-confirmed-for-middlesbrough-away-game/ the riverside is bigger than the cbs but gave us just over 2k

https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/sport/football/leeds-united/every-championship-away-ground-allocation-leeds-united-could-receive-in-202324-revealed-4195514?page=3 There's a lot of similar sized grounds to ours who give away fans less than 3000

he's talking about the league game as well

about 15 to 17 million

1 down 9 to go Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

They are skint Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

He is right though *I hate saying that ;)

palmer

and?

cool, no need for you to watch it is there

unlucky as Robins will never get a taxi in Shrewsbury

such small dick energy

Yet you cared enough to post a shit gif on this thread?

You asked me how I am but I don't really want to have private conversations with people I don't know. Please don't take this the wrong way.

It's more a case of allowing a policy the party supports to to be painted as a charge that will cost everyone thousands a year when it is nothing of the sort If anything from what the leadership has said they realise they need to offer more

4 out 5 Vehicles in outer London are meet ULEZ standards? These are the London Governments own figures. If you have a problem with the figures I suggest you take it up with them...

And how many of those are currently in the boroughs that already have the ULEZ and where the ULEZ is popular? For those who don't eat crayon, the Tory campaign painted the ULEZ as a tax on everyone when the majority of people won't actually be hit by it.

That'll do, players and management need to be better going forward

I'd prefer a few more players in first ;)

it did lose the election but as we have already discussed it is the weaponised version of it rather than the reality of the ULEZ. The tory campaign was able to paint a picture where everyone was going to have to pay 1000s more a year and that scares people,.