Search results

There's a lot of things he should be prosecuted for.

He's raising taxes during a cost of living crisis in a week when we find out that oil companies are paying no tax and neither is his billionaire wife. It's not a good look for those of us whose caps remained undoffed

Started watching it but haven't finished yet. I know this wasn't the aim of the program but I couldn't help thinking when watching it that the British public really are, by and large, fucking idiots. Poulton's barking mad. But there have been two dossiers of evidence, one put together by an...

Or perhaps if we hold on to everyone we'll be too delighted to worry about lack of investment elsewhere

I agree, but the same can be said of others who don't get the same scrutiny. O'Hare was a free where as Hamer, Vik and Sheaf all commanded fees. All 3 are equally erratic in my opinion. Vik missed a couple of good chances last night. Sheaf went in for a couple of challenges last night with all...

This is the 2nd thread dedicated to criticising him, that's hardly sweeping it under the rug And I'll continue to defend him because he's a vital player for us. But you won't find one post from me saying he's a good finisher but I do recognise his attributes.

Can someone link me one post where anyone has said O'Hare is a good finisher because I can't remember reading one but people keep mentioning others posting it.

Swept under the rug? Holy fuck!!

I never said his assists are low because other players miss, but was talking about a specific argument on here where people were trying to make out he hadn't created some really good chances in a 3 or 4 game period. I'm sure someone said Viks early miss against Reading wasn't a sitter! I mean...

Why would they? There must be dozens of clubs more attractive than us.

I've not seen one poster who defends him, including myself, say he's a good finisher. I've have seen his detractors use all sorts of mental gymnastics to try and prove their point. 5 or 6 weeks ago where it was pointed out that he'd set up several chances for other players but they'd missed...

Id imagine some are and some aren't. I know people who have shrugged it off straight away and others who have struggled. No reason to think our players are any different.

It's the same old story though Pete. Boss game, don't convert chances, they score with their first chance which stems from a defensive mistake. I do wonder if for certain games, against the top sides, we need to try something a bit different? Don't ask me what.

I think there has to be a middle ground, especially away. Look at tonight, trying to have you centre haves channel their inner Van Djk against a very good Forest side was a calamity. Though if we can find a way to turn possession and good football into goals we can carry on as we are and...

Same result though. I'm starting to find hoping to fluke a goal less frustrating that having 15 attempts on target and not scoring

I don't agree, I think the first 70 was because we were so poor in their box. Viks lame attempt, O'Hares chip over the bar, Allen's shot I'm really pissed off tonight. I think maybe because I don't see it improving next season.

He wasn't the only player who didn't strike a ball cleanly tonight, our striker didn't either! Dabo and maybe Bidwell and Hamer the only ones to come away with any credit.

That's was shocking.

Your last sentence makes you look really silly. I agree he's been poor tonight.

He was involved in the goal Saturday! The amount of revisionism on this forum is hilarious. I personally don't think he's anywhere near ready but let's not understate his contribution.