I am always on the internet, all day, so I come on here when pausing from what I am doing. SBT is a kind of in-between thing for me. Always have it up and open and flick through every 15-20 mins or so when I pause from what I am doing.
I am waiting for the answer on that one too. :)
I also wonder about this ruling. Why do we think the FL will insist on enforcing that? Why wouldn't they just fold on the matter? Not exactly shown balls in the past have they.
Yep. Totally.
I will not bite. Life is too short and I am a happy type of person, so arguing with someone so entrenched in his views and and someone so argumentative isn't going to do any good at all.
Said my piece, time to move on.
How many signatures now, Steve?
I accept that for sure. I just don't understand the negativity on the matter. We all knew it was spin didn't we?
Think we are going round in circles, Nick. :)
Would like to know that for certain. The difficulty here obviously is it is Wasps stadium and not ours.
Won't the FL just say 'You're have had more than enough time to secure your own stadium and not a single plan or brick is in place?'
Oh and my first post was I am very happy to be playing where we want.
Where is there any evidence there that I say Wasps want us at the club?
That is simply me saying I am happy we are still where we are.
To YOUR thinking.
I have never believed it to be evidence at all.
And I have never ever said I believe Wasps want us here.
I have always said that if it suits them then they are happy for us to stay. I don't think for a single minute that they want us here.
Not going to argue with you. All...
Yep, get all that. Just happy a story came out that wasn't negative.
It was merely a reaffirmation of what we pretty much already know.
Just think a lot of us keep expecting bad news.
Agree with that last part totally.
I am not trying to argue anything. All I am saying is that I don't believe anything, so even the primacy thing concerns me and I don't think we can put too much stock on that.
Of course I want Wasps to do something good. Rather they just pissed off, but...
Yes, good point well made.
At least in my defence I can say I don't just come on the internet to come on here and I am always doing something else. SBT comes in between my thought processes and pauses of doing what I am doing. :)
Stupot is a very good poster (one of my favourites on here), so sorry for tagging this one, but this just happened to be the first.
This could be seen as negative. The news (on non news) was good for Coventry City.
As Brylowes states 'Is it good for us or not?' Doesn't matter if it is a...
The negativity is of posters having a go at other posters over it.
In the world of Coventry City, non bad news is considered good news.
Some were seemingly miffed and annoyed that others were happy about this statement.
It's not bad news, so it is good news and like I say, how long have we...
Cheers for that, Nick. It is just one line though.
Do we have primacy for as long as we are there? Is it just until our current deal runs out? Are there any clauses in place that change that ruling?
Yep, but you are not getting the point, Nick (I won't call you naive) :)
Every bit of news coming out appeared to be negative (no to the Butts, the academy Higgs thing, the nowhere forwards on a new stadium, talk of Mowbray maybe going etc). Some of it of course only rumour.
This may well be...