Search results

Being serious though it is a very difficult situation in truth. The identity of the club would disappear and I guess selling your soul to the devil is not the most desirable of outcomes. The reality is though football sold its soul in 1992. I would not want it to happen but if it did and I...

Well I would still go. I wouldn't give it much though in truth.

Yes that’s really relevant given the margin of error Bungee Jumping Ed is as credible for PM as anybody

The reality is if the club succeeded no one would care - some will pretend to - but they will just still go anyway

He’s also 40

Many owners own the stadium through another company for obvious reasons. It’s very rare entities with zero connection own a stadium unless it’s got a long lease on it

The other factor as well for people buying then was the great endowment con which lowered payments but the growth never happened and the mortgage isn’t paid. What I was really trying to hint at was these properties now are around £100,000 and done up to a far better standard then then...

4 it seems are in a very serious condition 47 were injured with 27 going to hospital. I was in that area recently - I can’t see how the car got through into it.

There won’t be soon according to Labour.

Man City pay £3 m a year on the lease but get all naming rights monies as part of the deal. So they make a fortune for playing there. Stadium cost less than ours to build

We won’t be sellable until the short licence becomes a long lease

27 taken to hospital it seems with up to 4 seriously injured. 4 were trapped under the car.

Well that’s kind of my point

I can only go on what I see. One of my children and 3 of her friends all own houses worth £250k plus

I have clarified it was a flat, I bought a used sofa from ball hill

In 1990 my property was £38,000 I was earning £12,000 a year and 16% interest meant over 50% of income was on a mortgage. I got a part time job at the weekend and I lost £4 grand when I sold it Gosh it was a cake walk

The average wage in 1999 was £20k and average house price £77k - 1999 was a big increase YOY - many Gen X would benefit more than boomers

So we have to have one year? And we have one unproven made up example? So my experience of negative equity is as valid unless it’s only one year that counts?

You have quoted one anecdotal example and tried to suggest this is relevant - boomers tended to buy houses in 1990 - one anecdotal example (with zero evidence it’s even factual) proves nothing in reality - does it?

The average house price was 59,000 in 1990 - in 2025 it’s £296,000 - a 5 times increase 👍👍