Search results

  1. Q

    Butts

    One little problem, the bloke who owns the butts doesn’t know anything about us taking over his ground, think they might need to speak to him first , never going to happen
  2. Q

    Butts

    Agree with this, they know they won’t be able to play at the butts, council stopped it last time and they’ll do the same again, council want sisu gone, they’re not going to help them
  3. Q

    Stadium Deadline

    You think maybe that’s why sisu are talking about a ground share, might make Hoffman come back with a better offer, or is that just wishful thinking
  4. Q

    What attendances will we get at "shared" home grounds ?

    Good point, I still think there will be a deal done at the Ricoh, someone will back down
  5. Q

    What attendances will we get at "shared" home grounds ?

    seems a bit odd they haven’t asked the fans which of the 5 grounds we’d prefer to travel to ? Has there been any contact from the club through the Trust about the groundshare
  6. Q

    New Statement from SISU re. Council

    Groundhog day, only problem is Hoffman can’t afford what sisu would want...
  7. Q

    CWR tonight

    It’s not the other 4, Walsall didn’t want us last time, they won’t want cov fans in Birmingham on the same day all the other clubs are playing, won’t be MK dons ( nice ground though ) that leaves Northampton...it’s all been done before ready to go
  8. Q

    CWR tonight

    It’s northampton again
  9. Q

    New Statement from SISU re. Council

    Obvious that ccc have sided with wasps to stop us playing at the Ricoh, and can’t see them saying “ of course you can have some of our land to build your new ground on” not defending the council but if they’re trying to get sisu to sell isn’t that what we all wanted, think that’s what their plan...
  10. Q

    Is this a conundrum? If we do ground share..

    You know what, your right, every few years we could change grounds, we could go on a little tour of the midlands, and change our name to Coventry wanderers
  11. Q

    Woodlands

    Your right, let’s give them the benefit of the doubt, I think they’re just misunderstood
  12. Q

    Woodlands

    Fair point ,
  13. Q

    Woodlands

    True, it’s definitely big enough for both, it would be hard for the council to justify why they wouldn’t agree to sell some of it for a new ground,
  14. Q

    Woodlands

    R exactly, doesn’t look good does it,
  15. Q

    Woodlands

    It’s a tricky one redevelop a school or sell it to a dodgy hedge fund ?
  16. Q

    Woodlands

    If, and it’s a very big if, we believe Sisu have been in touch with the council since April 18 then it doesn’t look very good for the council, they’ve got a bit of form for this, talking to the club about buying the Ricoh just to give them more time to do a deal with wasps, this sounds like the...
  17. Q

    Woodlands

    Sisu are saying they’ve been looking at woodlands for over a year so call it April 2018, consultation for the new school development started October 2018, guessing it was being looked at long before October, either Sisu already knew there was no chance of getting the land but have just mentioned...
  18. Q

    Woodlands

  19. Q

    Woodlands

Top