Search results

Which side?

Had replies from Godiva and Grendel on this post, neither seems to answer the point so... Is that not the case?

I do hope it was not our final championship season! :o

As someone pointed out on another thread the other day, FFP can be gotten around via the injection of equity? If that is true then SISU could buy thier way back to the big time (and a selling position) should they wish to, regardless of the rent. Is that not the case?

And thats where we differ... Liquidation is not the best financial option therefore it will not be the chosen option

And if SISU lose the JR (after 18 months of tedious litigation) 'closure' will be?

I agree Grendel. I just don't think its an impossibility if SISU were to find themselves out of options.

Godiva, you clearly know more of these matters than I do. Why could a deal not be done? Surely if the rent is low enough the F&B'S become less important?

Is a rent deal really a no go? Post JR of course. They crawled back to the Higgs Centre when they had to.

Even Leeds! :o

and in other news... :thinking about:

Fair point, but wait a minute... you're not suggesting our owners have lied to us are you???

Ah I do remember this. It was along the lines of... We would rather spend some money on a permanent signing than waste money on expensive loan wages. Right?

Well it's not the first 7 pages of bollocks this forum has ever seen!

Thank you. That was my seemingly misunderstood point.

Which was my original point!

Complain if you want to, I'm fine with that. Boycott if you want to, I'm fine with that too. But I reserve the right to point out the obvious.

You may well be right. But could you answer my original question?