Search results

Its perfectly valid... just a little too uncomfortable for most.

Have you taken something? Anyway, care to answer the question?

So frees then.

There are none so blind...

Its a slippery slope. An imaginary girl could break her imaginary neck. Good to hear she tends to her path though.

Without getting into politics or blame, let me ask you a straightforward question... What quality of signing do you think we would now be making had we remained at the Ricoh and continued to pay the rent?

Does she take it up the council gritter?

It's looking more like the first option to me G.

That's right. But they haven't made us take them, we did have a choice!

So she's a little sickly. Worth it for the imaginary blow jobs.

So it's not the fact that the loans are 6 months that bothers you? (given that a free would be for at least a year and are 'just as bad') Really you are just bemoaning the state and current status of the club, right?

Apparently not... they want to boycott and then expect investment in the team. It'd be funny if it wasn't so tragic.

But we don't have to sign them. There are plenty of frees out there that SP could have chosen to use the wages on.

You know I find it hard to believe the club still refer to it in statements. Its like continuing to refer to your imaginary girlfriend after everyone has twigged that there isn't one. Just embarrassing!

No its not assuming that... it would still be a positive.

Nonsense generalizations will of course prompt nonsense absolutes.

and I get accused of being negative! Jeez.

What must Man City be thinking taking Lampard? Fools!

What a ridiculous remark. If they helped us gain promotion I'd hardly call them pointless from either perspective.

Not inspiring at all this one for me, hope he makes me eat my words.