Search results

Absolutely - solid reasoning. Your post was only included as context for Grendels response!

You are completely right, none of us know what they are paid. Oh what?

Moot point IMO FP. Would Kane have made any difference tomorrow, whatever the result - nope. Would Waghorn? Possibly due to our lack of striking options. However, if it was a case that keeping him for tomorrow would have put his move in jeopardy then it’s the right call to let him go. Plus...

Waghorn and Kane gone, that really is fantastic business. Well done to the club so far.

Variety of posts quite off the mark so far. IMO he’d be a great signing and the fact he’s been linked most windows isn’t coincidence.

Good professional but never quite worked for him here. Was not going to be a starter for us, even in a two when Godden is fit, and not an exciting player to have on the bench as he’s not a game changer. So it was right to move him on. If he was one of the higher earners, it’s even more of a...

Haha ignoring the big old caveat of ‘if they live up to their potential’ line I see. Keep going - I’ve been on this forum for years. That’s a lot of signings I’ve said are upgrades. PS I will credit the spreadsheet work, you must maintain an epic database. Impressive in a way, tragic in another.

Whip out the spreadsheet and find the post where I did then please? And if I did, I was clearly way off the mark - happy to admit that. But I’m surprised I ever thought that - hence why proof would be lovely. And if I’m going to be dragged into the pettiness I’ll go all in; evidence that...

Probably the same people who care more about getting to the front of the HT beer queue ahead of watching more than 30/35 minutes of the first half.

Yes - I think almost everyone wants it to happen. But nothing has moved from any sides as of yet….. One of the others mentioned is a definite possibility too. Sorry to be that really annoying cryptic poster but 99% my “source” reads here and don’t want to stop the info coming!

Gave this a like, but might have to remove it now……

Did I say that? And if I did, yet I don’t remember it but you do, at what point is that weird?

This thread is about Doyle and JWE, so if you’ve been saving that quote to use, you’ve wasted it. And for the record, yes 100%.

I know this thread isn’t really about him; but Doyle really is an excellent addition. He has had the odd shakey moment but crazy to think he’s only just 19. Not only his ability, but I imagine, as a baby faced youngster, he’s often target by the opposition both tactically and also attempts to...

I think this is a great signing, we now have dynamic and offensive WB on both sides - which is critical to how we play. Not ideal he’s a loan, but how big an issue is that? We know we have a rebuild either way in the summer, and if he’s better than what we can attract on a perm why wouldn’t we...

I know it’s already been called out, but deserves to be again; this is a mental take.

Confident this is a good thing and we’ll see some benefits this window.

The team MR put out was more than good enough to win the game - at least on paper. If you want to point fingers, you’d ask if in reality it was; Dabo didn’t look fit, Moore looked significantly under confident and Panzo uncomfortable at CB. These are all things he should know seeing the players...

Kelly has never been a great footballer IMO, but he offered something positionally and is an experienced head. Now his legs have gone, and we’ve stepped up a level, he isn’t good enough. Tbh it was slightly unfair asking him to be the playmaker today; he saw way too much of the ball for someone...

Panzo had a shocker of a game but claiming he should be binned is just evidence you’re a day tripper.