Search results

because the clear and obvious rule doesn't apply to offsides, it's wrong but it never has applied.

It actually will be accurate next season

Saka isn't a 10 Has anyone actually seen Burroughs play as a fullback? He was a midfield that played wingback as well when he was here. No proven goal scoring forward is going really want o be 3rd choice

Then you say it looked onside? Level is onside remember?

Oh when on field was no pen. That is never going to get overturned either way.

Because it was a pen, hand out and it stopped a ball that was travelling towards the goal. Nothing fortunate about it.

imagine this Simms for a full season net year

If it is unclear then why have they changed the decision, on field was no offside?

Yeah? I don't appear to be the one that has misread something on the internet and is now trying to deflect instead of just saying "oh, sorry I was mistaken I can clearly see now you at no time said the FA and PGMOL were the same thing"

yes and where have I said they are the same? the "and" clearly implies that I am referring to 2 entities

yes there are, the fa and pgmol are not unaccountable

why not, wan bissaka is a better defensive full back than anyone we will face next year he looks to be adapting his game well

i'll take shit that didn't happen for 50 please

we aren't going to get anyone who can play as good as he did yesterday who is willing to sit on the bench

they're silent as fuck apart from the set piece never walk alone bollocks at the start of games

the ball has not left his foot it has to leave his foot to be a pass

the redline goes over awb's toe as well

Most people in Manchester are United fans Let's not go down this route again.

that system isn't going to be used from next season

I know you will defend refs as your lad is one but come on Pete you can see the mistake in the drawing of the the lines.