Search results

I could see what Collins is there for yesterday, he’s more like another outfield player with his passing range and can push the CBs a few yard up the pitch by playing further out. He’ll take time to settle, that back like has only just met each other and I’m not sure we’ve found the best set of...

No van Ewijk?

I just wonder if that isn’t the way to phase out Fadz, rather than finding a like for like. With a better back line we shouldn’t need three as much. But I think you’re right at least at first Robins will stick with how we’ve played since the promotion season.

Id like to see us get a pacey hard working forward to go with Simms, and O’Hare back. But those are big ifs. I think I’d want better than Dasilva going forwards as well, someone closer to MvE’s level on the left. Then I’d be less concerned about having a standard DM alongside Sheaf.

I wouldn’t say fantasy, as much as I love Eccles. I think we’ll go 3412 with Godden, just having a play around with the available players.

All a bit t-shirt cannons ain’t it?

😆 Id forgotten about that. So perfectly City that was.

just don’t think with Eccles and Sheaf you’d get enough drive. You need someone who will pick the ball up in our half and push into theirs. Sheaf does that occasionally. Plus you’re losing 10 goals, Eccles and Sheaf between them might get 5 in a good season.

So you’re saying everyone knows something. 🧐 What do you know?

Collins MvE Thomas Binks Dasilva Eccles Hamer Sheaf Sakamoto Palmer Simms S: Wilson, Latibeaudiere, Bidwell, Fadz, Kelly, Howley, Eghosa, Godden, Obikwu

Yeah learning a language as a second language means you learn all the rules and grammar we just kinda take for granted too. And the guy was born in Amsterdam, he’s going to be fluent. He’s not from some farm town in Baumfookland.

Where does the cat come into this?

If he’s disgruntled. Doesn’t look it so far. Depends why he wants to go doesn’t it really. He can’t realistically ask us to let him go cheap because he wants to a year early.

In what way doesn’t it deliver? Is it as good as it could have been? No cos it’s watered down. Is it better than nothing? Surely? We’ve got no high speed rail compared to most countries our level. We’ve got a rail network that’s one of the oldest in the world. We cancel this and then what...

Not worth it

Yes because we really need infrastructure spend.

We need to fix the fact it takes decades and billions to so much as dig a hole in the ground in this country. And the political cowardice that means it gets watered down. There’s no magic other rail project that’s going to get funded instead. This is just more austerity.

Fact is if we didn’t have watered down over budget infrastructure we’d have no infrastructure at all.

Sunak really gunning for that 3% of the vote Lozza Fox has got.

You’re a smart guy. Maybe read up on why it’s actually being built.