As Otis mentioned earlier, only 3% of cases are granted right to appeal. This is so as not to waste time and money on 'grasping at straws'. So, the likelihood is this is something significant, would you not agree?
Blimey this is hard work.
The reason we are having this conversation and the reason this thread was bumped is because the appeals body has said that new evidence has come to light that will aid the defence case. So yes, we do know that there is.
So you agree that all possibilities should be explored and both parties questioned re their version of events? As would be the case in any other area of law?
I didn't call anyone a div. (although the candidates are plentiful) I see plenty of evidence on this thread of mob mentality. Otis is right, (as fucking usual) it is like walking on eggshells... you have to watch every word and we can't have a full and frank debate because as soon as you...
Yes actually. Do you know any men who have been accused of it?
And that's not what I said... for the record: I would describe those who insist that a man is still guilty despite that verdict being overturned (should that happen of course) as no better than the mob.