Search results

If hes signed then it has to be because hes better then what we have, if we're only looking at numbers then it's a no, We can't afford to spend what little money we have on back ups.

just like to point out i'm not a knee-jerker. didn't want him here to start with :D

Had a year contract with another year option. Somethings not quite right with him.

This is one of the very few that has stayed pritty much on topic.

It has to be this, there's no way they'd turn him if he was good enough but lacking fitness, take a month at most for him to get match fit.

Sorry, I didn't know we were still under the transfer embargo then, but still those type of players are the ones we should have been signing.

Why not? some of the better films I've watched recently have been foreign. The Counterfeiters, Oldboy & I saw the devil are all excellent films, and it's refreshing to watch movies with a different take on the way they are filmed. I saw the devil is a horror/thriller, but from the outset it...

Tactical ability Ability to see issues and address them without problem

Agree we need a nasty CM too, but Doyle isn't the man, hes far to soft, a Michael Brown type would be perfect, someone who would happily kick you into the stands for nothing. The Nottingham Forest goal, where their player ran half the pitch showed the lack of desire in the team, not a single...

lol, yes, you're right he only exists in my head. Clown. I pritty much described Grant Holt, but i'm not expecting the 30 goals to go with his presence. 10 is good enough for a player like that.

Yes why not McSheffrey? according to a vast amount on here, hes by far the best striker. If he is then why isn't he played ahead of everyone else and a left winger then brought in? We only have one target man in Ball and as from what i've heard he isn't all that, as far as i'm aware Bruno hasn't...

That has got to be a joke hasn't it? :laugh:

I know exactly what I want and what I think we need, but can't give you a name as I'm not all that clued up on the lower league players, as I said earlier we should have picked up Roberts, stuck him on the right to replace the shambolic Baker & Bell. I would have made him my first signing...

That's what the midfield is for, think we missed out on a decent player in Gary Roberts. I think he would have been far more influential then any other signing made so far.

I've watched him many times, hes another modern day footballer, athlete first footballer second. The not clued up comment was on the players available for cheap/free, not at the general standard of football.

I'm not all that clued up on the lower leagues, but if hes the best available then there's a serious issue with English football, Conference would be his standard and that's being kind.

No it's not easy, never said it was and it involves a huge slice of luck too, but you need to build a squad, you need players to play of each other, you need players confident in each other, one will think if I make a run in front of that defender the lad on the wing will at least give me a...

Brilliant, I don't mind usually seeing it, but at an event like the Olympics it should be all about fair play and that kinda thing.

Maybe we are trying to get enough strikers in so they can play 1 in every 5 games, be champions no problem. :whistle:

Just the wasted money in wages and missing out on someone who actually might improve us.