Search results

5%off a full structural survey circa £1k?

analysis also suggested there was a reduction in the number of people being infected without developing symptoms, who are still thought to be able to spread the virus This bits relevant too,yes? Fill us in scientist.

Not sure ,feels more editorial to me?

Suppose you could if you wanted to create a private option. Oxford for Joe bloggs . Phizer to the wealthy?

Here's a thought. If it's presented as less effective than those previously announced from overseas at greater cost and difficulty in delivery would that stimulate demand in the British public to seek/prefer those at greater cost . Looking to deep? Sorry can't get my head around the downplaying...

The left one goes on the left hand and the right goes on the right,right!!

Just mute him from your lives, it's just his twitching feet before the rigor Mortis sets in . Let it play out, he's gone.

I just find the focus around the lower figure irrelevant, inclusion of the lower data suppresses the efficacy and wastes dosage. Just my opinion I'll leave it there as just my opinion.

So most likely to be promoted by the WHO.

Astrazenica. Although the data of the second more successful regimen based on 3k volunteers appears to increase effectiveness and make the vaccine go further,why downplay that . Unless they don't have full confidence. Pundit's observer's etc saying I'd be extremely happy with 70%,why would that...

It was confusing as that's how it came across on BBC at one point . 70% via one shot . Like I said earlier presentation a bit bizzarre, why even bring in the first figure it's misleading. It's across Two dosages regardless of the quantity in the first one.

Yeah slightly confusing as the 70 figure is derived from the data of both regimens. Almost like the presentation is to depress the share price.

Looking at it again ,1.5 shots just about correlates to the entire population . Serendipity or who knew Lol.

Implication. More players test positive, financial burden of Covid impacts club ?

Guess so,100M though . Would have thought that's be enough for the uptake to be fair.

Yep me too. 131 caught the virus I think,31 showed symptoms,no info yet on subsets.

I do wonder sometimes if there is a passive desire to keep a little bit of it knocking around. The state of Victoria has just eliminated it within their territory.

Couldn't be useful to third world countries.

From the Hancock interview this morning he seems to think something approaching normality will prevail by post Easter. Now if that's when vaccine is delivered to population IDK , but coming towards summer it should dissipate anyway as we move outdoors again.

But it seems it isn't,yet that's how it's being presented Given the others all require a double dose to achieve their efficacy threshold,why not measure like for like. A half dose followed by a full dose achieves the figure of 90% . Apples with apples. Edit:-plus it's 20% the cost of the...