Search results

would cost an absolute fortune even on loan and we have simms already so no need to spend that much also he wasn't on loan, he was sold and then Villa had a relegation buyback clause

Can't see them letting him go without a replacement

you are a strange man, get help

We aren't interested as Burrows while having a great left foot was suspect defensively, we already have a defensively suspect lb.

i have explained this to you before ignore as the same says means you ignore the posts of the person you set as ignored to see their posts that means you must be selecting "view ignored content" on each thread stop being disingenuous and obsessed with me and how about you actually talk about...

to be fair most partnership deals are intial 1 year deals allows both parties to walk away if needed

no, it's fine it just takes longer to sign better players

Trippier can go

Aye, he's not a bad player but i'm not going to lose sleep over a 29 year old who didn't really want to sign for us.

hope not ;)

Right, kit today and keeper tomorrow?

he's lying, he lashed out because he said something stupid

you're obsessed with with me, it is your nature you are a horrible, horrible person who throws his toys out of the pram and cries if anyone wants to know the truth, you started this when i pointed out we probably shouldn't be signing a 9th tier keeper based on a video they posted on youtube...

what would you know about mates skippy?

Yes you villa c**t yes Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

More of a recruitment and CRM software company

i do like a bit of blue on blue violence

Not sure he is, we gave him a pay rise will he was the 1st choice keeper

If by wound up you mean "laugh at" then you are spot on mate

Okay fella, if you can't admit you were wrong then crack on. "oh hahaha Fishy Moores!"