Search results

I know they were quoted. We tried it v Shrewsbury, it failed. We don't have McG no more, so you can talk about playing 4-4-2 to with them upfront, but what's the point? It's not my 4-4-1-1 system, Robins' takes credit for that, it is a fact we've won more games when we haven't played 4-4-2...

No wonder the other Home Nations are in the shit! All the good Scottish managers out there and they get Gordon Strachan!

But you're the one saying he "might as well have" have resigned :facepalm Like all footballers, he was cheap talking.

We've lost more games at home playing 4-4-2 than playing the usual Robins' formation. Of which we've only lost 1 using 5 in midfield v Carlisle.

Why are you saying McG 'may as well have' resigned!? You're not making sense, he didn't resign, and is at Ipswich, long gone! V Shrews we played 4-4-2 but McG dropped deep to be the ball, it failed badly. Accept it. No offence, but you are an idiot, of course it fucking matters what...

Good questions asked. I think give it perhaps 1 game between J. Clarke and Baker, if Clarke under performs, drop him, he played well v Tottenham & PNE, Carlisle at fault for the goal, but I don't know if he actually played badly from then. I think Sheff's 'surge' is coming to an end, with...

You tried to make a point that Clarke needs a strike partner and posed the question of should we play 2 upfront, Scunny are down at the foot of the table, we are not. We really kicked on in November and December, playing 1 striker.

You say that, but who would be his partner? Elliott? Ball? Cody? Rod? Not good enough IMO. We should try and get another striker in, most likely a loan at this point in time. We've also played 2 strikers in a similar amount of games at home this season, didn't improve our form then...

We're not Scunthorpe.

What? He didn't resign and that is that. We did try it v Shrews, that's how we were going to play it. I think the formation we played in November and December is quite important, seeing as that was when we won the most games etc.

You did, you agreed with LJC who said Christie should start. Because a neutral doesn't care about any of our players so will judge what he/she sees, as I am supposedly a 'fanboy', and you clearly don't like Clarke (and have gone off Christie lately, but still prefer Christie) so they don't...

I literally can't dive left!

Yeah, I have, but I thought he hoofed it v Shrews because we were desperate, v Spurs just to clear it and v PNE, I thought it was to match their physicality. I didn't watch v Carlisle so I can't judge, v Tranmere however, I'll judge. It is a shame if we hoof it, we can stick to our usual ways...

Not condoning Clarke not jumping for the header, but that was a very well placed header from their lad! CBs got ripped straight through the middle. Just saying.

No one said that, but is turning into a little bit of a witch hunt. Not aimed at you (at LJC) You didn't utter a word of complaint during Christie's 4 game stinker.

Photoshopped.

I think it is unfair to judge after 2 games as a lone striker, especially as he scored in 1 of those games. I'm not counting spurs because we don't deserve to be on the same pitch as them and their class was clear throughout. Lets just wait and see.

That's only if his contract runs out, then we sign him, the agreement that might be in place means the parties have agreed a deal.

But Adams has been accountable for goals as well. Also, if Adams gets injured, what then? In this way, your argument relies on Adams staying fit, but what if he doesn't!? Thus your point is flawed. I've been CCFC games with neutrals (this season) who have said negative things about Adams, I...

We'll see if you're right this transfer and loan windows because MR knows if he needs a RB. I don't think we NEED a RB, I think what we need is a LB cover (unless one of the kids is capable), or even CB cover, the best thing to do at this time, is to sign a versatile CB who can play RB and/or...