Search results

Thanks, thinking about it rationally I don't suppose we can say no to £2M now for a player that's gonna stay with us for the rest of the season. With add owns not too bad £3.5M. Just goes to show absolute conjecture the £7M bids.

Source?

How the hell can Gillingham show great resolve to reject 4 bids of £2m and yet we accept £2M....I don't think for one minute it's £2M

Ditto, lads gonna be distraught.

Usually the club that pays decides if it's disclosed or not. What a disgrace. We should have a right to know how much we get for our prized asset.

Don't have a good feeling. Gutted if he's gone.

Let's wait and see. 100 % certain whatever the money deal will be with loan back.

Crazy last few mins..

https://mobile.twitter.com/NorwichCityFC?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor Maddison, could be truth in it. One for the future?

Link?

Hmmm...another setback? I thought he was back in training. Anyway he would third choice RB, behind Ricketts and Lorentszen.

Lorentszen, Phillips, Ricketts, Willis, Stephens, Cargill, Martin, Ramage, Stokes and Haynes. Could have 10 fully fit defenders in a couple of weeks when Willis is fit.

Which is exactly my point initially, what chance they both play. I hope this isn't a case of having to play inexperienced defender Cargill ahead of Martin. No no more chopping and changing.

in that case wouldn't be surprised if Sam Ricketts had a huge say in this. Be interesting as it unfolds.

Good point....but all in all Cargill will get a chance, hopefully not through injury!

No way ...should stick with the players that have had an outstanding season and got us into this position. Cargill should be on the bench. Ramage not even in the squad.

With the one confirmed central defender signing Stephens, and potentially another one Cargill. Are they both likely to play? Once Martin is back. Back four is likely to be Ricketts, Stephens, Martin, Stokes its quite likely if one of the centre backs are injured Ricketts will play centre...