Search results

Obviously answer would be it died through admin,and it appears we sought something other than before . Technicalities such as absence of clauses around other team playing there present a material difference I'd have thought? ACL may have needed something altering there?

Got to ask what's happened in the interim?

Not that ferret . Just the naivety/appearance of going through those motions. They should and do know these games It was always how they go.

Wallace? It's a honourable name round these parts.

Doug king always the stalking horse better days suggested ? Could have been simpler surely! Gilbert could get the answer to the signed deal?

Chances both ends now Great

1-1. Great header

With what Dave?.Sell off our talent again? Lose the management team? Turmoil again. It's a shitball 🥺

Crackling, lard, dripping!!

Show us the pictures.

Offside from the header!

Goal.

Oh chance!!

Game over? Thank you so much everyone involved

If you wish to read that,why not length which is also part of terms?

Mirroring terms!!

They were all at the court as soon as concluded, guaranteed from my point of view available to sign a matching agreement King pipes up let's do a Jarni deal Mike? Club says no dialogue failing to sign it . Must have been dialogue as Frasers aware club wish for changes. Sits around for two...

There have been various different suggestions of how it was paid for .

It's clearly there "Mirroring the terms". Unless I'm thick that means costs and length. The only thing different would be the absence of a Rugby team not being there every other week from our side. From theirs well?

Ready in place once confirmed which from the moment of exclusivity was guaranteed outcome