Search results

Germany lose? Haven't heard that since 1966!!

Daft twat has got to be in there somewhere surely.

Okay. What I initially thought then. Why has Torch been told he will he will get a new one I wonder.

I absolutely bloody love unrealistic optimism.

Cheers, Torch. I've not been told aanything. I just renewed my seat online and heard nowt since, apart from snippets on here. I got mine in May too. Guess I should expect a new card through then.

Can't remember now if I am getting a new card or not, or will be using last season's again. Thought it was going to be the latter originally, but didn't someone say we are now all getting new cards anyway? If so, not had mine yet.

Yeah, I didn't bother to go back and I made no mention of going to the game to anyone either. Might have seemed mean at the time, but I felt fully justified when the marriage only lasted 3 months.

Yeah and I was best man at my brother's wedding and still snuck out to go to the game City had on that day. Went to 'the toilet' straight after the speeches and just didn't come back.

We haven't touched the loan market yet though have we. We get in a Samuel, or Armstrong or McGoldrick we'll be fine. I trust Robins is on it as we very speak and I am not unduly worried.

Top 8 is absolutely fine as long as it's not 8th.

I really haven't got a clue. First game, nice day? Could be anything from 6,000-9,000. Hope it is the latter and we get off to a storming start to the campaign.

Yep, I don't think we can start slowly. Think we need a good start to the campaign for sure. There are an awful lot of unknown factors and I haven't seen any of the new players play yet, but I do have faith in Robins to have assembled a competitive squad and a team that will battle for 90 mins...

Same. What a waste of a brilliant show in the end.

I think it's fine when you ask yourself how did this character get to here, but with this it was bloody obvious and didn't need any explanation.

Well yeah, of course, don't literally mean a couple of sentences of dialogue, but within some dialogue. Too much padding for me and Lost was a prime example of that. First few flashbacks were interesting, but then they did it for just about every bloody character. I don't think in Ozark we...

I really, really dislike flashbacks in any show. Even though they can give a back story, to me they for all the world just come across as padding and I always think that all could be simply explained with just a couple of sentences of dialogue. I thought Breaking Bad was superb, but even with...

Nope, didn't sign. We plumped for Courtney Baker-Richardson instead.

What were the eye roll moments, Hill? I didn't pick up on any, but maybe be it's just me. Were they obvious?

She's been with enough of them (allegedly).

Promotion. It's written in the stars. Just my opinion.