Search results

They weren't all civil cases, see link below. Regardless, you're going to say that anyone standing for potential election should not be able to be prosecuted? And where's your evidence of the courts' electoral interference: I've listed the cases, which one do you think was based on falsehoods...

"Lawfare"? Either you believe in the rule of law, or you don't. If you want your far right zealots to stay out of court, maybe pick ones who don't commit crimes. Which court cases, specifically, were unfair. The sex pest one? The one where his company committed fraud? The one where he had...

Agreed. And sometimes he looks like he's playing in flippers he's found at the bottom of the canal! Got to get it in the box for him, that's his strength, but we're just so, so slow at doing it in some games.

Good reality check. The difference between a team attacking with intent, and one going through the motions.

Shot on target. Whoop!

Tats turn to have a crap game this week. Not interested in crossing or trying to beat his man in this second half...

It's always worth thinking about what these seemingly abstract cuts mean to people's lives at the bottom of the pile... https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/mar/23/social-care-cuts-benefits-disability-labour-whitehall In the meantime, there's seemingly no plan to redistribute from...

By the rational metric of increasing austerity and drastically cutting welfare, which Labour government in living memory has done that? Which one literally took on Tory financial dogma and welfare policy? It's a really poor defence this, do you think voters who see nothing getting better are...

Come on mate, are you really pretending that this Labour party is somehow left leaning? On what evidence? This "Labour" party has adopted Tory fiscal policy and now their welfare policy too. They are literally cutting benefits to the old, disabled, and unemployed. They are actively hobbling...

Duct tape. I'd probably go with black to align with the decor, but you could get the silver stuff instead and make it a "feature". DIY rules are dead simple... If it moves and it shouldn't, duct tape. If it doesn't move and it should, WD-40. 😄

I'm sure it felt like I spent my entire (undistinguished) Sunday league career playing uphill and against the wind. I just can't figure out how it always happened both halves. 😁 Quite a few older grounds ended up with a 'crown' in the middle, didn't they? I thought it was because the centre of...

I suppose if you're going to have a bad one, you might as well make it memorably awful.

On the upside, MVE and Sakamoto are back on it. Thomas looks a proper attacking threat and is finding some superb passes. And.... err... I always liked Eustace when he played for us. Bidwell, bless him, comedy gold. If he doesn't spill a drink all down his front on the coach home, I'll be amazed.

It's like we're trying to get Wright to do Simms job, and vice versa. Not playing to either player's strengths. So frustrating.

Surely it's time to put Wilson up front. Could hardly be worse...

Have a like, though I've absolutely no idea what a treq thingy is. 😄 I assume it's someone who can pass the ball forward, mostly to someone in sky blue. In which case, I agree.

God knows why, he's done very little of use tonight. We are at least showing a bit of threat down the left now.

Bidwell, who I generally like, is having an absolute nightmare. Has to come off...

Not exactly inspiring. Feels a bit like possession for the sake of it sometimes . Simms simply isn't a great target man, it just doesn't stick to him, and he looks ponderous imho. Wright also looks a long way off his best. We can turn it around, but it will need a lot more aggression and...

Also, WW2 and Jesus. That wouldn't have happened if I'd been President. Hitler and Pilate, strong leaders, good people, I like them, we could've had a deal. Though you know, Europe and Jesus, they didn't have the cards, they really shouldn't have started it.