But it matters not if it's Oggy's fault or not. Bottom line is surely that Burge is not the keeper for a promotion chasing team. RCC is too hot-headed. O'Brien came in, commanded his area, looked assured on crosses and constantly organised his back four.
It's the two dreadful mistakes in a row...
In my opinion Glazier was 10 times the goalie Oggy ever was.
Different times though for sure. The difference between Glazier and Oggy for me was that rather than dive and palm away, Glazier would dive and actually catch the ball, so imagine a shot blasted in with the keeper stretching. Most...
Yeah, but thing is on the poll, so many contributors would have never have seen Glazier play, as they would have been too young. Had they seem him play I am very certain the result would have been different.
Well true.
I would have definitely said that O'Brien was an improvement on what we had, but these two errors have concerned me. I would think it now logical for Burge to come in on Tuesday.
Unless he has a mare I think he will stay in.
What I don't get is that he is 24 and we have had him...
Not to my mind he hasn't and it is Burge I am talking about when I say 'what's the point of him even being here?'
Think you agree Burge isn't good enough. So why's he still here?
Kelly's challenge for that second goal is non existent. He just seems to track the player half-heartedly into the box.
Two very poor goals and O'Brien had no right into thinking he even had a chance of getting to that ball.
I wonder if Oggy had any say so in bringing O'Brien to the club.
If Burge comes back in it will be interesting to see just how much Oggy has improved him. If he isn't improved at all, then you have to say what's the point him even being here.
If we have a good goalkeeping coach we should at...
You can't go far wrong with Alfred Hitchcock. So many great movies he made. Psycho, Vertigo, Rear Window, Rebecca, Suspicion, The 39 Steps, The Lady Vanishes, Notorious, North by Northwest, Shadow of a Doubt, Frenzy etc.