Search results

Desperate.

The trouble is that figure seems to represent about 3 timed the normal. Like we're not funding just the match. We'd need to be expecting something for it to justify it.

Guess it depends whether anyone has a long enough memory to refer back to the candyfloss drawings from about seven years ago l.

Can we opt for Kingpower this time please. No conflict of fixture's?

Was a debenture last time , haven't heard anything similar this time?

Tense times isn't it We absolutely must play our games. No more financial or match disturbance

With Richardson becoming a director recently shouldn't his fund's be being utilised?

After all subsidised Tom White recently?

Didn't want to spook something going on back then,but wouldn't concealing they'd done that be an issue?

Time to hit your councillor's chaps.

Unless it comes off an eventual purchase?

Always thought the figure was around £50K . Breakdown of our original rental agreement.

If money is changing hands to get the game on could that indicate it's coming from the eventual purchaser as part of what's accepted in the overall deal? Not withstanding a chicanery move by Richardson?

Make sure no strikes.

Whoever it is, has to be someone likely to be on the pitch .

Requires some discussion between the squad, management and coaching.

Well time to overload George's email account isn't it , for another expansive answer . Yes.

Mistaken really but although it related to immigration it was market sensitive.

Scrub that. Did I hear yesterday that among all the appointments yesterday someone was appointed underneath her who should it be necessary more immigrants will be permitted to work here regardless of what her Stance is?

Is Reuters suggesting that Braverman was insider trading?