Search results

Bournemouth appointed Howe after we appointed Robins, Bournemouth were lower than us, yet were champions before that finish at Griffin Park and at no point did we win 3 in a row. Apart from November and December, it's been an awful season. Robins turned us around, but our position wasn't as bad...

You certainly are 'special'.

I remember when I did that in Geography at school. I'd say Football is religion-like, most certainly.

Are you for real?! It was clearly a sarcastic comment saying an injured Murphy would be better than a fully fit Dunn after his horror show v Crewe. :facepalm: You certainly don't deviate from that Schmuck label I gave you.

I said Fleck starts under Pressley, in fact, he's played well lately, been a hell a lot better than Bailey, Moussa (really disappointed with him lately) and Jennings easily. My point is that in a 4-4-2, Fleck will start under Pressley, so who do you play with him, and I pretty much said that...

My bad, completely forgot when posting. In saying that, Murphy would still be better...

No, the Max Clayton example was to refute the claim that playing an inexperienced player on his own is suicidal, obviously, it isn't, as I firmly believe, 'if you're good enough, you're old enough', and if Wilson or Philliskirk at 20 can't hack meaningless L1 games, then, I'm sorry, but they...

No, you have flawed logic, whatever people's opinions are of me, they can't say I have flawed logic. The latest example is, "playing 2 striker doubles you chances of scoring", evidence? There's none, if it was the case, why do the best teams only play 1 striker? Also, I'll refute that on a CCFC...

I did, so what? I wasn't using it that context because your definition is simply out of date and actually, irrelevant. Schmuck is used in the same context as I said, which is to say some is a fool etc. End of discussion surely?

Murphy Christie Martin Wood Adams Baker Thomas Barton Fleck Moussa If it's not Clarke, does it matter who plays upfront?

Max Clayton is a great of example of this, not! He's 17 and he had a season in L2 when he was 16, he could hack it because he's good enough. There's just no evidence to support your claims, how's getting taken off a bad thing? It's tactical or they just didn't play well, probably because they...

Thanks for the reply. Perhaps in the summer when I have more spare time after: schoolwork, work, rugby, and social commitments. I would've joined the trust at the last 2 home games... But I've been late to both of them! :facepalm: and I don't like doing online transactions involving...

Of course it was, look at the big takeovers in lower league football, they've all had brand new swanky stadiums that attract investors so they can develop the land and make a nice profit, that's why people invest in football, PH4, like anyone, wants to make something off his investment, that's...

Another clear and concise answer from SBK. Cloughie's definition is an outdate definition, and obvious it weren't what I was calling anyone, and the word schmuck is used to call someone a fool rather than a penis, even Jews use it for hat purpose. Answered your point? You've just been...

Out of curiosity, how do the Trust decide what line to take? Do they: - Set line based on its elected leaders? Which wouldn't necessarily be the fans' voice. - Have a vote of all it's members to decide? Direct democracy, but is this practical? Just wondering, it'd be nice of I could...

I didn't say it was, but if you're going to discredit me for the copy and paste, we may as well discredit 90% of your posts, anyway, I only questioned why you felt the need to post another definition for 'schmuck', after Cloughie and I had already done so, I've known the definition and been...

You're still ignoring the questions I pose: do you think playing 2 inexperienced players or not. Simple yes or no answer so cut the BS. I do t understand what point you're making by stating when they I totally reject the notion that SP is as tactically aware as Thorn, SP has shown he's...

Might go a bit pale also.

Firstly, I don't really know why you've just another definition of the word schmuck, we've established it's meaning, and I already knew it meant penis, and it meant foolish etc. To your point about young players: 'if you're good enough, you're old enough', Wilson and Philliskirk haven't been...

I've got one, I'd be well pissed if they took it down!