Search results

Is that meant to be an insult because I'm a socialist? They are both nationalistic parties, that's my point - with a bit of research there are many UKIP councillors etc. with racist pasts and even at present liked racist pages on Facebook, an example, is that councillor who gave a nazi salute...

6 years before intervention in Iraq so that's irrelevant, it was 9/11 that made Iraq happen, not the Kurdish-Iraq civil war. I'm I'll-formed? Yet you make a sweeping statement that has no evidence while I have an example that refutes that, Lebanon, Christians and Muslims co-exist together and...

No, of course not, not like the UKIP and the BNP got 1.5m between them last election and the Tories are the majority party, not nationalistic at all. We're resisting EU integration because of our nationalism! That's a good thing, nationalism only divides people, needlessly, the only thing...

Have you got amnesia? We're in Afghan and Iraq, innocent people have been killed, the USA and UK have antagonised the Muslims and have allowed this extremist threat to breed. Put yourself in their shoes, how'd you react if we had different nationality soldiers patrolling our streets armed to...

No, 9/11 claimed 3000 odd lives and many more injured, 7/7 claimed 52 people, 700 injured, more people died jumping out of the WTC than people killed by the blasts of 7/7 to have the 2 tragedies on the same level is actually a joke and actually, an insult to 9/11. Lets not forget that the USA...

You obviously didn't read it properly, I said, if it was to describe Muslims (as a whole for committing this crime) then yes it would be racist, but I did say if it was to describe the crime, then it wouldn't be racist.

Why would that be!? Would it have anything to do with their religion?!

Well, yes and no, WillieStanley said the word Muslim, BUT, someone said they shouted 'God is Great' (in Arabic), then followed by 'fecking cunts', now, the bolded is what I find very contentious, and could be racist - depending on context - as my initial reaction to it was, 'does he mean Muslims...

Like 'The Sun' in the aftermath of Hillsborough... ... Not like they've changed though.

TP their HQ, that'll teach them for messing with the Cov MASSIVE!

Lets wait and see.

The things I'm weary about is him being a 'property developer', but that could have it's own strengths as well though, and how much of his wealth is 'real' as in not tied up in property value.

True, I can be counted in that too, BUT, if it wasn't true, then ACL, surely, would've came out with a statement denying this, that's what I would do if I had anything to with ACL, the absence of a statement refuting this certainly suggests that this was the case.

I used to work for ACL and have defected to SISU :facepalm: Seriously though, I criticise ACL because they need to be scrutinised as some people on here believe ACL are absolutely blameless and whatever SISU do is wrong, put in very broad terms. I have criticised SISU in the past, I said...

You're missing the point here, my point has nothng to with the rejection of an offer ACL deemed reasonable, my point is about future events which involve ACL rejecting an approach to negotiate a rent agreement, because ACL rejected that, Fisher's comments saying we've been forced out is...

What I was saying that the club had eaten humble pie and asked to renegotiate, but ACL rejected that approach, so if what I have said is true, then whatis the alternative. My proof was a CET article, I think the one where ACL confirmed negotiations were off, now, I found that article, but...

The local media should have been doing some investigating on this whole fiasco, but I'm guessing they may not have a budget to facilitate this, I don't know. Why does it not suggest they weren't going to compromise? I personally think that the approach to renegotiate was a desperate...

Given that ACL rejected the approaches meaning that a deal for a rent agreement for CCFC at the RICOH could not be achieved, and no facility in Coventry is fit to host CCFC match fixtures, the logical thing to do is to move out of the city temporarily. Would you like to propose an alternative?

But that was in the past, when SISU came back and asked for a renegotiation, it would suggest that they were willing to compromise, but because ACL rejected it, we don't know if SISU had intentions to compromise, if ACL had accepted and SISU didn't compromise etc. then that last comment would be...

Like my post said, when CCFC/SISU came back (tail between legs) and asked for a renegotiation, it was ACL who rejected it, and that's when this ground share possibility escalated, ACL forced us out. Ideally, we all want CCFC to own the RICOH outright, but, that does appear to be a very...