Search results

<p> Surely at this stage the best way to ensure that is to stop sisu getting back the golden share?

Why would you want them to give up?

At away games only.

<p> Well whilst both companies could have done better, in my opinion acl have far outperformed sisu over the last few years.

<p> Yes but it would seem the contract means nothing to sisu anyway.

<p> In fairness had sisu paid the rent like they were contractually obliged to then they could have continued playing at the Ricoh for another 3 years and acl wouldn't have been able to stop them.

<p> Funding isn't an issue, its the administration of it that's the problem. I.e. Who is going to take charge and set this up. The club itself would be self funding after this point.

As in the club and ground united or just Fisher and Labovitch worked for acl?

Anyone would think the board of acl were in charge of Ccfc!

Option 1 for me.

Why could they not have just transfered the golden share to holdings and liquidate Ltd in the first place?

Why would it be laughed out? Its a contractual agreement.

Strange, you opened the thread with a swear word. Are you bald?

I don't really understand the point of this thread. Was it a feeble attempt at trying to encourage more people to follow the club to Walsall?

Ok, I'll piss off. Enjoy watching another Sisu devised relegation.

This is my opinion too. The only time on here I have criticised someone for going is when they criticise me for not.

Its null and void for only the period in administration. The contract still exists, it doesn't just go away because Tim Fisher says so.