Search results

yeah and i've watch lots of them and they all follow a similar narrative. he also never met a strawman he didn't like

Did he have reasoned debates? All the "debates" I have seen of his seem to be him answering other questions apart from the ones asked and attempted gotchas.

no, he's allowed to say he didn't agree with his claims he was about debate.

nope, not unless we really have to

To be fair most of the UK far left are clueless but harmless cunts like the SWP, while there are some people who are an issue there are far less than on the far right.

Did we? So basically you have no evidence of this at all. Ok

We absolutely battered Oxford in the first half and most other days would have been out of sight by half time. We also scored 5 away at Derby in a great attacker performance. It'll be a tough game but it's just the QPR game that is reason to feel confident.

Southampton fans have stolen the Portsmouth stinky blokes wig.

That an american flag/gun shirt? could be a disguise but not the most liberal thing to weasr

works fine in the NL

So is mine, if I'm wrong so be it :)

no, not really it's a roof a short distance away, a shot a practiced amateur can make and there was no security at all.

or he could of not we will see when they find out what happened

On a side note when researching how far trained snipers can kill from I discovered that a sniper from Ukraine killed not 1 but 2 Russian soldiers with 1 shout from about 2.5 miles away just last month. That is pretty mental to think about.

I agree, that does seem the most likely reason.

All the talk of professional hits etc is a tad off to be fair. I think everyone should wait until they even know who did it first at least.

so they didn't hit the upper torso

so they didn't hit the upper torso

I guess no one expected this in a small town in a very conservative state

nah, a pro is surely going to hit a non moving target in the head from 130m it's most likely just someone angry with Charlie Kirk for some reason.