Search results

I've seen these,shenanigans before. Not for one minute suggesting it's happened here but it does go on.

Bit harsh mate!

Plenty of teams get similar sums to us. Look on any transfer site, most have us down as around 7th highest spenders for both this season and last. So clearly, while spending the sort of money we're unaccustomed to, it's not a excessive figure for this league It's also a very dubious metric, if...

But that doesn't indicate that I think it would guarantee success. It just indicates that I think by hook or by crook we need more bodies and I can't understand anyone arguing against that. Ideally we'd have landed Browne or Stamenic, but it didn't happen so yeah, January it is.

Couple of points, firstly, over 2 seasons, plenty of teams get in the region of 45 million to spend. Secondly, who exactly would be using any future windfalls to recruit? When you say recruitment team, who are you referring to?

I was on about the start of last season

Only if we're using the conflating two seasons method, which I refuse to! If anyone one tagged on the end of 22-23 to the start of 23-24 when we were shit I'll give them a pass on it!

That was meant to say games.

This time last year, with Viveash in situ, we were in a very similar boat. Let's give him time.

And that's all that matters really. No disrespect to Scunthorpe, but I don't care what went on there.

I can't unsee your inappropriate use of capital letters now it's been pointed out!

None of that justifies calling for his head after 7 days. I appreciate you weren't doing that.

Saw this. Hes got a world of shit coming his way. Is being edgy on the Internet really worth it?

You wouldn't want a striker in the squad if all our other strikers were unavailable?

Not arguing with that. But there's two ways of looking at it, we've been here before give him time. Or things are worse than ever, what's changed, if its the latter it's crazy not to question the new coaching structure.

If you think my post makes it sound like another body guarantees success then I don't know what to say. I think me saying it's not ideal hilights that I don't think that at all. But it's preferable to the fingers crossed we don't get another injury approach.

Can you point to anyone who has not aimed one bit of criticism at Robins?

I've criticised Robins, but you won't have a word said against anyone else other than him. It's strange given the success he's brought us that you want him to shoulder all the blame. Why not just fuck all these other chancers off if theyre not responsible for anything?

Similarly some are desperate to defenda new coaching structure over our long term manager. Seems to be based on a 2 page spread in the CET and Man U doing something similar!

I agree. But seem as we're supposed to be applying gold standard physiological assessments that doesn't bode well. Or was it hilighted but we went ahead anyway?