Search results

Did think about that though did also wonder if not replacing could be construed as constructive dismissal in order to remove the role?!

And did he choose to operate without an assistant? Because that's been my main beef aboutcthe new set up. I haven't really got an opinion on the new coaches as of yet.

I'd say King is a difficult owner!

If I thought getting rid of Robins would bring about, and this is the key phrase, long term improvement, I'd be happy to do it now. But I genuinely don't think it will. I don't agree with Shmmeee that 'the club is rotten to the core', but something has gone very wrong with the playing side as...

I think he's a good organiser, a good motivator, a good leader and he's been able to pull the club together and drag it through adversity, (up to now).

Loads of the Robins in camp are regular attendees. Really not sure where you get that from.

It's also worth pointing out who the kids in question were. Not often a bunch like that come through. You normally need experience.

He said that he's involved but has taken more of a back seat in the last 12 months, (this was a couple of months ago).

Could be rats. If you need any help with that there's a thread on the off topic that might be worth looking at.

I'll tell you what I find strange, people making out the posters who want Robins to stay are saying he's blameless when everyone of us has criticised him. Yet the same posters it seems won't even consider the new coaching structure, recruitment policy and performance director could bear some...

Imagine if we'd got to the final and beat Man City we wouldnt be having this debate, but neither scenario happened so its pointless discussing it.

Alex Ferguson wasn't the best tactician, his strength was man management. That's why you work alongside someone who's strong in the areas you're not. It happens in all industries.

So we're talking about someone who won't require compo, (currently unemployed), and who won't demand bringing in his own people, (desperate).

We've got new ideas. Maybe they're the issue?

Do we really want to get on that merry go round unless absolutely necessary? Compo for Robins, compo for any other coaching staff who are surplus to requirements. Rinse and repeat.

That term maybe over the top but his general point is spot on.

I disagree about the AM position but if Robins agreed to get rid of it then he's more culpable for this mess than I'm currently giving him credit for. Though I personally don't think he did but that's just my opinion

Using that childish logic if you're calling for Robins to go you must want Slade back.

Can you name one poster who's said robins is blameless.

I've put it in several posts, he's changed the dynamic of the squad, he's removed all experience, he's removed the assistant managers position, he hasn't utilised loans, and the effect is glaringly obvious. These are all things Robins has utilised in the past. If you think removing them is...