Search results

Nothing. He's probably had no media training, probably would rather have been doing anything else and has been thrown in at the deep end. Still came across as gormless, I probably would do as well, but I wasn't interviewed and he was.

I'm going by his interview, he might be sound but he came across as a gormless twat. I appreciate he's been thrown into a bad situation but that's how he came across as far as I'm concerned.

Doubt its with as much relish as some had chasing the old one.

He's literally just there to fill the bench for one game, which is good because he seems like a right gormless twat. Whatever happens, good or bad, won't be on him.

Captain Shitebag

So will I, while simultaneously being delighted we've won.

To be Perfectly honest, I haven't a clue. Though I think the profile will be a young coach in the McKenna mould. Fairly sure they'll be fairly unknown which will be uninspiring at first I doubt it will be anyone with anything more than a modest current profile

My liver is trembling as I read these suggestions knowing I'll be late out of the pub and early into it if it's one of these buffoons.

The irony about you saying people make things up in their head. Let's put everything on Robins, he had 7 years of success. He then stopped using loans, got rid of the experience and got rid of the assistant position that had served him so well. He brings in a new coaching structure, results go...

So if its so good and is going to work why get rid of the man that introduced it? You know its bollocks as well asI do. The insistence the new man works with it speaks volumes

Answer the question, why are we keeping things in place that the failed manager introduced? Why did Robins do away with things that had served him well previously?

I'm getting it. You're saying Robins implemented the new coaching structure. It failed, he failed, he's going it's staying and the new man better work with it. Come on, seriously?

Yeah, whatever happens tomorrow really has no bearing on who's in charge for 1 game.

So you keep the failing framework implemented by the man you sacked and insist the new coach has to work with it. Do you know how ridiculous that sounds.

Another one trying to detract from Robins earlier work to justify his sacking. He was a success before King came, to say otherwise is absolute bollocks. And I've said regarding this season he has to share some responsibility. But he should have been given longer, especially as he got us to the...

She? s that a typo?

Why is King keeping the failed coaching structure the manager he just sacked implemented?

No mate, Robins implemented it. But we're getting rid of him and keeping the failing structure!

Well seen as he's gone well be getting rid of the coaching set up he implemented which has been a failure won't we? Oh wait, the new man has to work with it! Strange that!

What improvements has she brought about? And if its too soon to see results how long do we give her? Why wasn't Robins afforded the same patience?