Search results

Really not enthused by Lampard but him working with Eccles and Torp is one thing I'll look forward to

So King, who admits to knowing nothing about football, decided to rip up what brought us success and threw Robins under the bus when it didn't work?

The structure. If Robins put it in, why are we keeping it? If he didn't, why did we force the manager to move away from a structure that had brought him success even if it was him that chose the personnel?

Well clearly. But plenty on here won't have it that King's been setting this up for a while.

So if its on Robins and its failed why are the club insisting we keep it? Why won't people answer this?

But that move was kibosh by King apparently. Whatever the reason Ramsey didn't come Morris will tajevup a position that doesn't currently exist

And Robins has just been sacked for poor results. So if he introduced it, and he and it failed, why are we insisting the new man keeps it? It makes no sense? Not that we will keep it anyway because Morris will take up a position that currently doesn't exist. It's all bullshit.

And why would he change the squad demographic that's served him so well?

Think he said he's in talks with a club rather than City specifically but it would strange if it was anyone else

While agreeing with a lot of that my main issue isn't the no loanees in isolation, it's the no loanees and not replacing the experienced heads. In doing this we've changed the demographic of the squad away from what brought us success and I think that's a mistake and I don't think it's all on...

His Huddersfield departure was a made up story.

A solid 9th,10th,11th would do me.

Not sure you can call all that extra revenue pointless.

That's a recruitment failure in my book. And if its true, I seen it on here but never seen it verified, that no team has ever gone up without a loanee then its piss poor.

OK, are you happy we're the only club who failed to find one who could improve us when the other 23 did?

You're absolutely insane if you think employees aren't told what to say by clubs media/pr department etc. There's the famous example of the Everton player who was given a statement to put on social media prefixed with 'just post something like this' and he posted the whole lot including that...

If that's correct then that's a big recruitment failure in my book. When all other 23 teams managed to secure loan players.

No, but we've got no loans and we didn't replace the experienced players, what have they got in common? And if I'm wrong about the loanees, why do you think we haven't got any?

It's a made up quote as if that's what was decided. It's not a prediction for the future. And if its not policy and we've failed to recruit one when everyone else has then that's also a huge failure.

And the we love doug mob on here will lap it up. I hope someone points out that the teams that get promoted use loans.