Search results

  1. chiefdave

    A strange game being played

    Not sure there's that much too it. Trust we're being questioned on why they hadn't released the results, they said they were waiting for one response people said publish what you've got. Once the Trust issued a press release the CT might as well release their story or they have no story - it...
  2. chiefdave

    Shame on Nuneaton & Bedworth

    Think the Trust need to pressure N&B council. Found this on gov.uk: You should receive the information within 20 working days. If the organisation needs more time, they will contact you and tell you when you can expect the information. Some sensitive information might not be available to...
  3. chiefdave

    Is this Coventry City's new home?

    Hard to say for sure until it happens, which it won't, but my current feeling is that if we move to the other side of the motorway we're no longer a Coventry team. If we were moving because it was essential and there were no other options maybe I could accept it but that's not the case.
  4. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    Where is the city boundary? Wouldn't that site be so close to the city that CCC would be involved due to traffic flow, potential infrastructure changes etc?
  5. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    You're more trusting than me! I won't believe it until it's built and we're playing there. To be honest I thought they would have purchased a piece of land by now. That's relatively easy to do and is unlikely to go down significantly in value. Thought it would be an easy way for them to try and...
  6. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    That didn't make sense to me either but I just assumed I was missing something but on the face of it if you can't get permission for a community centre there's no chance of getting it for a football stadium. Wonder if someone from the trust could contact NT and get their thoughts on this.
  7. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    That's just a report on the SBT press release isn't it? Not clear if the quote from N&B council is a response to the FOI request or just a random quote from someone they've spoken to before running the story, if it's the latter it's meaningless.
  8. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    would NT want that? how big are their crowds?
  9. chiefdave

    ticket details for arsenal

    wasn't really a moan just wondered if they'd put the numbers of tickets per ST up to try and annoy people. I haven't been a ST holder since 1991 / 92 so doesn't really matter to me!
  10. chiefdave

    ticket details for arsenal

    has it always been 4 tickets per season ticket? Seems high to me. Why would season ticket holders need more than one ticket anyway, wouldn't you go to an away game with the same people you go to Sixfields with who presumably all have season tickets as well?
  11. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    It's Les Reids secret identity :p
  12. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    I hope its something that's actually newsworthy and not some SISU BS that's been rushed out after they've seen the trusts statement today. Although if there is just one site to be pinpointed why don't SISU just say where it is?
  13. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    by working hard does he mean having a look on here and deciding it must be in N&B?!
  14. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    Not really, we already know Fisher and Labovich are lying so even if it does turn out they've spoken to N&B that's a long way from a new stadium being built. They've got to find a suitable site, buy it, get plans drawn up, get planning permission, get funding, put it out to tender and select a...
  15. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    they'd have no chance if NT were to get promoted before they start work on the stadium. Football League rules stipulate a club can only move into a new stadium if it would not adversely affect Clubs having their registered grounds in the immediate vicinity of the proposed location. Not sure if...
  16. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    Even without an answer from N&B we know Fisher and Labovich have lied as they both stated they were talking to 2 councils.
  17. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    SBT included Solihull – no such discussions was the response
  18. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    If you turn down a FOI request I think you have to state a reason so it will give the game away anyway as they'll have to say something like the information requested can't be provided due to commercial confidentiality.
  19. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    Quick look on Google Maps it looks like it is in use as farmland, anyone know for sure. Land hasn't different classifications doesn't it, would land that's currently used for farming be tricky to get planning permission on?
  20. chiefdave

    Trust: 6 Local Authorities say no discussions. Rugby say no.

    You can get some smaller councils but they dont have full responsibility, for Leamington they are overseen by Warwick District Council who are the planning authority for the area so there would be no point in talking to Leamington Town Council as they aren't involved.
Top