Search results

No the fact is he’s stating UK automotive companies rely on those supply chains. That is what he is stating. What you are stating as fact is what you are inferring (accurately) from that. They will go down very quickly. As will the U.K. automotive companies. It’s a shame the U.K. government...

Are EU automotive suppliers involved in the negotiations? You do realise, as usual, you’re diverting rather than face up to any failure by the leavers? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thought this was project fear? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

On a lighter note, I’ve just set the fire alarm off by burning toast as I was catching up on the thread while sat on the toilet rather than paying attention to the kitchen. I reckon the government would spin that as “huge progress” being made towards achieving breakfast. Sent from my iPhone...

What are you even arguing? You could have just said you didn’t mean countries but large groups of people grouped socially and economically. The reasonable thing to ask in reply to your original point was to suggest a country unhappy with the EU as governments and MEPs of said countries are the...

There are two explanations. The one you suggest in your final sentence or that they have very carefully chosen the time limit to achieve a balance between giving parliament too little time to get anything done while be able to maintain a shred of credibility. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Seizing power from parliament which is where it resides. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is key. For all the talk of the EU offering something else there isn’t much wriggle room. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

An example of humility and politeness deserves more recognition in this thread. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Here it is in case you have forgotten what you wrote a few minutes ago. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

None taken. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

“Typical remainer rag” As discussed at length above, the point is not whether the paper is pro remain or whether there is a certain irony in Corbyn being seen as the saviour. It’s that a major newspaper that in any other circumstance would be pro Tory is now calling out the government and...

Apologies if I’ve missed the strict sourcing policy of this thread. Anyway here’s a link to a tweet Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I just lifted the picture from twitter mate, the highlighting was already there. You’ll notice, as you read them, that the words “may also” are still present and so the meaning has not been changed. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don’t see why the hard Brexiters and no dealers have been pandered to so much throughout this process. They’re what, 25% of voters? Nobody is going to last as leader or get anything done until it’s accepted a compromise is required. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The independent sections were receiving money and data from the main campaign, that was part of the activity and reason why it was referred to the police. I’ve literally replied to your post above saying you acknowledge illegal activity went on when you’ve highlighted issues with the remain...

Ah so you concede there was illegal activity during the referendum and the democratic process was interfered with? Why do you start your post with “where did the leave campaign break the law”? Surely you’re aware of what happened and that there is a police investigation pending? I’m sure you’re...

I’m repeating a typical slur used to discredit any negative coverage surrounding Brexit for comedy effect as being pro-remain and denouncing the government while stating a preference for a Corbyn led caretaker government are vastly different things. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bloody remainer rag. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Favouring a Corbyn caretaker government! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk