Search results

Good one 🙄

It’s all he’s got. He’s obsessed. Everything is about finding some perceived moral failing whether he’s talking national politicians or randoms on here. Like some weird cross between Martha from Baby Reindeer and Hyacinth Bucket.

And yet you can’t help yourself post about them constantly. Feel free to stop any time. Believe it or not I’m genuinely not interested in what your opinions of me are even after a decade of you being obsessed with me.

The Internet in 2011 was a different place IMO. You were a bit weird if you used your real name outside of Facebook. Doesn’t matter anyway, there’s enough obsessive weirdos that eventually everyone gets doxxed on here.

I thought it was just because he was tediously obsessed with random posters. Will come on, make 48 posts slagging people off, call Nick fat, then get banned. He’s the definition of a troll. At least Grendel occasionally posts actual content.

We have been over it. I’ve explained to you before what the thread was, I’ve also explain that I haven’t ever worked in land acquisition I worked for a PropTech start up and did work for land buyers, I’ve also explained that I haven’t worked there for a couple of years and now work in home...

“Many on the left” Hahahahahahahaha That’s a good one man.

Me: here’s stacks and stacks of data proving my point. Grendel: Ah ha! But didn’t you once ask how the tax system worked? Check mate socialist! Lame and weak. All that attention from Boosh has weakened your troll game.

Do you reset each night? Or perhaps sober up. We’ve been over this. Margins on luxury builds are better yes. That’s about fit out not plot size though.

Still trying this I see. If you’re going to make things up, at least make them interesting.

Builders get rich like anyone else by building things people want. If people are buying the houses they’re building then there’s demand for them. If we increase supply then prices fall. This isn’t some wacky theory, it’s basic economic fact and we can see it in the data of the few places that...

But that would apply whatever the size of the home is. You are paying £250k for a room in London in some places. Do you want starter cupboards? There’s a price per square foot based on supply and demand that you can’t get away from. Take me. I’m not young, I can’t afford to have a family and...

By far the biggest help to landlords and property investors is the restriction of supply artificially inflating the value of their investments.

Aaarrtggghhhhh! The UK is not short of tiny houses! The problem is the tiny houses cost fucking loads. To reduce this we need to build more houses.

For balance. This is shit from Starmer. Obviously raising taxes isn’t something you can’t afford any more.

Really don’t get why “just build more houses” gets this response. “Oh what if instead we force everyone under 30 to bunk up in a big dorm?” “What if we introduce draconian rules on property ownership?” “What if we forced everyone to move to Hull?” “What if it’s really young people today...

We have the lowest percentage of unoccupied housing in Europe. And even then you’re taking a country wide number. What does an empty house in Grimsby do for a family in Cambridge?

Considering most of that post is nonsense. Yes it is. Clinton’s defence was around the definition of sexual relations, nothing to do with sentence construction.

It’s all one market! You can’t “reduce the price of a 3 bed semi” without also reducing the price of everything below that. Otherwise everyone would just buy three bed semis because their price per square foot is significantly lower. Then people selling two bed houses would have to drop their...

Come on mate. “Kids just expect too much”. What a load of reactionary bollocks. Yeah the numbers living with parents and homeless has gone through the roof cos they’re all waiting for a 4 bed detached at £100k to come on the market.