Search results

where does it Swing SISU's way ,I don't see that more that it exposes the connection between both in legal terms and therefore the whole club is in Admin.:thinking about:

I think that will be down to a court ,the League are sure enough of their ground .

Ken Bates.???:o

Beneficial ownership would only exist because Holdings fund /Run club for LTD,He said if legal ownership claim on LTD failed they would go to Beneficial route!:thinking about:

Yeah Right!!!:pointlaugh::whistle:

Is that right ?? I take it the referrence to beneficial ownership would have to be proved over legal ownership in court. If the argument is that beneficial ownership supercedes legal ownership it must also prove the two are inextricably linked and indeed the whole club is in Admin and...

Havnt read the thread buf is this not like an auction of airport lost poroperty where yuou purchase a case without knowing the contents

Can't answer in certainty but one of the reasons the trust was re-invigorated this season was that there was a recognition before kick off that there was a very eal danger of the Club falling into financial meltdown ,resulting possibly in Liquidation ,thank god thiis danger was recognised. I...

I thought they did when they got as far as heads of terms and Due diligence Who knows what happened afterwards?

I did hear and post on here some weeks back that i had heard that the PFA were involved as some of the kids contracts were in question over the divided nature of the clubs structure ,whether there was or is anything in it ,who knows .

Obviously Clouting as he was gone Pronto but maybe not as he was taken in Initially.:thinking about::)

Would'nt involve confusion with the FL muddying the waters over an error that may need clarifying ,possibly through legal means would it ,or that the FLhave indeed given Sisu permiisssion to play outside the Conurbation?

And as I was saying .............cheats never Prosper .....................Hopefully:)

Benfica ......... one of the most cynical cheating conning sides ever to grace the game and its even worse when they play at home.:slap:

I don't believe this is being conducted for the purpose of whether fans would back a move from within the City,if that were to be determined it would have been much earlier ,way too far down the line now ,its manouvering of some sort.

As trust members were unwilling to assist with arrangements for a transfer (undisclosed ) out of town ,don't expect to pass fit for purpose test ,will the Database get hacked??:o:thinking about:

Edit;Sorry thats what they mean about us.:p

Tenacious buggers are'nt they:thinking about:;)

Jeees thats the third spelling mistake in the one post ,i managed to edit the other two out.:thinking about::facepalm:

I was of the opinion that it was purely to push the two parties to solve the problem of playing in the City on the one pitch solely designed for the purpoose.:thinking about: