Search results

Redskins are safe then.

Flogging a dead horse there, Nick. There are clearly two things wrong, albeit that they are linked. 1. We are not creating enough. If Jones doesn't threaten, we as a team tend not to threaten. 2. Two holding midfielders leaves us lacking going forwards. This of course is linked to the first...

In terms of the only thing that beat us.

Nope. I would say not. Was he in the six yard box diving in for the ball? Guess it's hard to tell from that clip.

Can we blame McNulty for that? Surely that was down to tactical deployment from Mark Robins.

Yeah, I think Nazon will come in for Ponticelli, because McNulty did play well.

Yeah, I don't think 'dominated' is the right word. They simply had more threat and stretched our defence, but when we had the ball they were much more compact.

We did have a 10 minute spell in the second half too, but it was more just possession rather than threat.

I couldn't see the point of Haynes yesterday. If Robins told him to play in that restrained way then we might as well have played Stokes. Thought the whole point of Haynes was for his attacking play.

Yeah, tis a shame. Would definitely have considered going if City weren't playing.

Yup and we became clueless. They pretty much marked Jones out of the game and then we ran out of ideas.

We are simply not creating enough chances.

Could have happened yesterday had we scored that first goal. First 15 mins we were all over them and they had no answer.

Home I take it?

I thought McNulty played quite well yesterday. Not as prevalent in the second half, but then of course none of the players imposed themselves much after half time.

We didn't create many opportunities yesterday that I can recall.

Who do we have next up?

Very true.

I am. You know what, first thing I did when I came home from the match yesterday was not to come on here or go to the Beeb site to look at other League Two results and the table etc., but was to go on the BBC sports page and look at the rugby results to see how Cov's rivals had done.

Yeah, we weren't that bad, but I think people have based their ratings on the fact that in that second half especially, we didn't really threaten much at all. I think for the most part we were average rather than bad.