Search results

I certainly think its something worth looking at, don't you? Or do you think we should have a closed mind on such matters?

Then we're into an individuals view on phoenix clubs. Some see them as the same club. I certainly see the current Wimbledon as the same club that won the cup.

The business or the club? Two very different things remember, as the business has already been wound up by our glorious owners once before.

Really? Where are these "loads of people" then?

I'm sorry but you clearly demonstrate the loser mentality that has affected this club for the last 40 years. The "oh well it will be better next year" attitude is what has held this club back for so long. You should be demanding change, and you should be demanding it now. Instead you just keep...

Because he's an idiot.

Two things he should know: http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/wasps-rfc-strike-deal-complete-8110467 http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-city-fc-takeover-rumours-8531899

What then? Well this: We will at best be 6 points off relegation to the 4th tier, in the lowly position of 16th if results go our way, with most teams below us having a game in hand. So yes you're right. A win tomorrow and everything is wonderful with our club.

You agree with appealing court cases now then?

The situation you are describing there though, would be that your house was responsible for the mortgage (if that were possible), you are just the owner of the house.

I am not particularly in favour of any sort of organised Nopm campaign this time. It will be unnecessarily divisive with very little benefit. Crowds are plummeting anyway now (season ticket renewals will be non existent IMO), so ticket revenue will be very small, without any of the bitterness...

In fairness there was a thread on here a few weeks ago where the majority were saying it was wrong to appeal against the decision of a court.

Yes I agree.

So what if he did?

So you were wumming?

Your a very rude man.

Of course simon does. Hence his links to the telegraph website. I'm not criticising Reid for having a vested interest, I am criticising him for bemoaning others for having a vested interest when he does himself.

Great logic. As I explained though he does have a vested interest. His job is dependent on local news.

Yes, but I wasn't the one who started the "vested interests" allegations was I?

Perhaps, to prove your point, you could give an example of where you have discredited something you agree with?