Search results

So no feedback on the one held tonight for Corporates Legends Etc ,either meaning it went on some while ,they all signed a confidentiality rider or no one of that calibre posts on here.:facepalm::(

I put it down to age and a little naivety. The fact that so many vowing not to go are silver haired or hairless demonstrates opinions formed over the long term and not so fickle as to abandon their principled stance due to a cup run ,a special offer or a call to arms played through emotions and...

yeah Like Revie over Gordon Milne:mad:

Obviously ,that be where Haskell comes in. if we can examine all sides information, that is /has been quoted many times as a falldown on the SISU Bid. It could be CCC reluctance or based on directives from the Initial planning approval.

Is it possible that this is why CCC has been so adamant that a sale has to involve commitment to carry on regeneration of the area ?

Agreed SW ,Its subhuman . Will it ever be feasible to recognise the signs and Intervene to save these desperate children ? personally I doubt it .

You getting warmed up for tonight / Going with JR . Ask this one..........."If FFP is so paramount to survival ,why will this seasons team Budget be less than 33% of last seasons turnover based on assumed Turnover of circa £6M" ?:p

I've inadvertedly turned mine on . Bloody annoying all these red lines ,there's one under inadvertedly as I type.:confused::(

That's because its not an easy one to ask. Last seasons turnover Circa £6M. IMO . Without interests +management fees pretty much breakeven ` This seasons player budget stated@ £2M. that does not represent 65% of turnover ,more like 33% or less .That to me says SISU are not funding us...

What Level of subsidy will be required for the season after next if its 33% of this years budget based on Crowd assumptions ? This coming seasons player FFP figure is quoted as £2M. which is not 65% of last seasons turnover but more like 33% or less so who is Funding /subsidising what?

Its a free country Ferret ,no stick from me and no judgement ,you are a fan of top order without doubt.

Commitment............financial commitment ........they're not making it ,like they say they are .

then agreeing the deal offered provided the best outcome for the fans and FFP team affairs. But building a new ground and having a war with ACL and the fans Builds Value for S~ISU apparently.

Does a judicial review enable a response to be made ?? If this is indeed the case why wasn't it brought nearer the event ? Why not just Publish the evidence?

you're football club has been hijacked ............taken hostage.

Liqudation will bring Zero return on the Debt unless there is some cunning accounting advantage to it . Makes them unfit!! To sell on you couldn't have a better scenario than now. If we're all meant to go along because of some Big stick ,no wonder 75% said they wont follow them out of town...

But you're making a couple of assumptions when you put your take, then ask your question. we don't know that Higgs were offered £6.5M. or more and we don't know that they were asked to support the deal by taking on the Mortgage .

To gain what??

Not according to PWKH IIRC

Why do you think that .What has Holdings got that is worth anything at all ,Arvo hold the Charge .Rumour is Ryton has already been sold ,who and why?Funding going forward or someone recognised they need to max out? Apart from a few contracts and a bit of hardware =Peanuts ,the chance of making...