Search results

Anglo Welsh cup winners, European cup runners up, Premiership runners up. All whilst playing at the Madajski.

No, do we own land in Rugby suitable for development? We can buy it. How can we build on land in rugby if we don't own it? How can we make the owners of land in rugby sell up? The same thing we're planning on building in rugby that offers non matchday income. Would development of...

Can we stop comparing Wasps moving to ccfc then please?

Top 10 premiership side.

London Irish

Firstly I was in no way questioning your loyalty as a ccfc fan, so I apologise if it come across as that. It's just frustrating when you get accused of condoning franchising for just pointing out Wasps reasons for being here. As for owning the ground, we don't need to own it to get matchday...

No fans buy tickets. One of the biggest contributors to a clubs income.

Can't be bothered getting into Wasps talk with you, I'm a ccfc fan. Your talking in Fisherisms. There are 2 forms of income. Matchday & non matchday. Matchday income is likely to be no significantly better at a new ground. So the question is about non matchday incomes. Now why would...

A) Where have I said it's ok? B) Where can Ccfc move to where there will get more fans? C) Isn't it the admins job to keep threads on topic?

Because they didn't have as many fans attending down there.

Because there is larger potential support up here and greater potential. You still haven't explained how commercial activity in Rugby will make money but commercial activity in Rowleys Green won't.

We don't need a new stadium do we? A stadium is only needed for a pitch, and somewhere to house paying fans. We already have that. What we need is additional income streams. Now you tell me why some new commercial activity built on the wasteland behind the Ricoh wouldn't work, but some new...

So no reason at all then why they couldn't construct something on the land across the railway line.

If that is the case then pointless owning the Ricoh. Massive part of its income must be from outside the stadium bowl.

Top 6 minimum.

Two crucial things here. 1. The club has had decent support in the past, and the product on the pitch was still shite. 2. The club had no involvement with CCC in the past, and the product on the pitch was still shite.

Pricing has never been the issue. If the product on the pitch is good enough then people will find the money.

The problem is people don't want CCC to have any involvement in ccfc (which I understand and agree with). That however is contradicted when people say CCC should have forced ccfc into changing it's stated position on the Ricoh.

Was that around the same time sisu said they didn't want the Ricoh?

Great comparison. A sale of a public asset compared to a war with thousands of deaths. Jesus wept.