Search results

Yeah I think if he’d been the player we hoped we wouldn’t be having this convo. We’d be talking about how we need a Kelly style backup for Sheaf.

I do get it. I’ve repeatedly said the reason we haven’t got one in yet is because we keep getting gazumped, but as a fan it’s still concerning we haven’t got one in over a year.

We have to actually build the stuff. But the idea the answer to climate change is anything other than technological progress is thankfully dead.

We might as well be having public debates about the political implications uploading our brains to the cloud or time travel.

There is no evidence we are any closer to AI than we were ten years ago. This is all fiction writing at this point.

Ab was going to say I went from BHX a couple of weeks ago and had no queues, but I did take the monorail thing in.

We’ve had a couple of windows. That’s the problem.

Yeah no he was awful, just being a pendant and saying some of it could be down to tactics.

Devils avocado here: if you’re a midfielder who want to play forwards and the team is set up so deep every pass has to be inch perfect because the gap is so huge then maybe it is the managers fault.

43 here and I remember Bertie. I’m assuming Winny is on school hols :P

We’ve literally been having the “can’t do it unilaterally tho” debate since 2008 Steve. It’s like the climate debate before solar basically solved it. Endless hand wringing that doing anything might have unintended consequences while suffering the consequences of doing nothing.

This is why I’m pro debt right now. We are so far behind most developed countries on so much I think you’ve got to actually deliver before asking for cash now. Too many broken promises. It’s all just wishy washy scaredy cat crap and has been since 2008. The right were scared to take on the...

Then give the wider context. Honestly I’d put it to a referendum at this point. Do you want the debt to go up, taxes to go up, or severe cuts to public services? People need to stop pretending ending DEI spend or foreign aid is a serious solution. Be honest with what you’re advocating for. No...

Because it’s a temporary cost because we stopped processing any asylum seekers and have just had exceptional couple of years. It won’t be £3bn in perpetuity, at absolute worst if the numbers stay the same the cost will come down with proper long term provision. If the black hole is mythical...

We can’t be Ireland, we left the EU. If we’re a low tax haven with no access to the SM what good is that? If you want to be a Singapore you need Singapore’s trading relationships.

Making long term business decisions based off Twitter memes is certainly a strategy.

With what?

Not from a decade ago, from the last decade. It’s a loaded question because it’s contextless and as I say gives different results from all the other polls on this question. £3bn a year is chicken feed. Need to tackle the big costs. Pension and healthcare. Especially healthcare. You want US...

Kitching as a massive fuck up let’s be honest. They happen. Especially on dead line day. Let’s hope all involved have learned their lesson.