Search results

Right so no due diligence but would like the chance to buy the stadium. Who is this aimed at? The council can’t just pull MAs bid and give it to this guy? Guess we’ll know a bit more after the court case but this has a strong chance of going absolutely nowhere. Has anyone listened to the...

Yeah this should be alarm bells for everyone.

Also means they can’t afford all of it.

It’s a shout. Makes sense with the timing. I really don’t think we should be celebrating yet.

Yes but the statement seems a bit try hard in pointing that out? All feels a bit PR to me. Is this just the move people were waiting for SISU to make? “No debt”, “regeneration”, only bid that guarantees the club a home…

Yeah but it’s late and just grandstanding? If court goes to plan MA has the stadium tomorrow? Something isn’t right…don’t think we can celebrate yet.

Agreed. I’m worried this is a late play from SISU and leaves us open to turmoil between two owners.

But if DK can’t get the stadium what happens then?

Is this the Saddlebrains rumour..?

Wtf is going!? Last minute play by SISU to derail the Ashley bid?

I’m thinking SISU will want to cash in on 2 of the big 3 so no.

A point I have made before. They may have funds, they may not. If they do they have to way up CCFC against other investment opportunities. They don’t have the emotional attachment we do. It may be better for them to crystallise their losses here and invest in something else. On them misjudging...

His energy and running is important to our play.

Well quite. I think the problem is people have little trust in the council so as a whole they have little wriggle room for plausible deniability, particularly when it’s ‘there were no plans/discussions, well apart from these early discussions which didn’t really go anywhere or get as far as a...

This is what makes me uncertain about the whole situation. The preferred bidder status and process is very opaque. Also why I picked up on the regeneration argument as it had been used as justification as to why MA is preferred bidder.

I can agree with all of that but part of the issue is that Reeves would even entertain it. While I can understand he might have to come up with something it was a ludicrous idea.

Would it have interfered with the flying taxi port?

If you look back at post 12,409 in reply to me schmeee is now saying he’s not made the regeneration argument!

And yet he drew up plans for 30m. You make some fair points and some people are probably reading too much into certain things but some of your defence is weirdly try hard.

It’s not just sentiment. It would secure the club and mean no more arguments about rent, moving grounds in disputes etc. Until then there is always the threat of homelessness. I’m not asking them to ignore bids. I’m pointing out that your argument that regeneration is the councils main concern...