Search results

Are they the same or should they be the same? If they are all fixed costs and both offers cover exactly the same things as matchday costs then you could reasonably expect them to be the same. I'm sure ACL could make an affordability argument, if ticket prices suddenly shot up they could argue...

Would depend on what you were including as matchday costs. If you were comparing 2 deals where the matchday costs were covering the same items, and all those costs were fixed rate rather than variable according to attendance then yes you would expect matchday costs to stay the same. Of course...

For all we know the stewards were paid for by CCFC as it was a permanent deal with 25ish games per season. For a one off or occasional game isn't it more likely that staff are provided rather than the hirer having to provide their own staff. We don't know and that of course is the big problem...

Sure he must have a friend who lives in the city and can ask for him.

I'm don't think it was recent, think it was before the JR was started by SISU causing everyone to shut up.

Not really a question anyone is going to be able to answer is it? Why don't you ask your councillor? For all we know they've tried to and Higgs have said no!

If you have a dig around on here I think PWKH has mentioned it before when someone was claiming Ricoh would terminate their contract due to the club not being there.

Would you generally expect a company to release details like that as and when they happen? I would have though it being in the accounts was correct. Do other companies make a big deal of announcing it when a contract ends for any reason? The naming rights isn't a big secret, Ricoh extended to...

If Higgs had withdrawn their claim wouldn't it have needed SISU to also withdraw their claim?

Was that after the rent strike? Would non payment have rent have voided the right to purchase the share? Or was it just done on the basis that the Higgs would hold onto it until the club were ready to buy and not sell to a third party without that ever being formalised.

Is that it? Not really worth getting worked up about is it? Paragraph 1 is what many people on here would agree with, the club and stadium being part of the same company (or group of companies). Paragraph 2 is a statement of SISUs position, and seems in line with what they have said, at least...

Did the right to purchase the share owned by the company now being liquidated preclude it from being sold to anyone else?

Is anyone actually going to let is know what he said?

£1, the club is worthless. The customer base has disappeared, the club is performing at it's lowest level in most peoples living memory with virtually no assets and huge debts. If it was anything but a football club it wouldn't be in existence anymore. The key is what someone is prepared to pay...

But presumably you'd be happy to give it to Tim Fisher for free.

I would imagine if they have been paid up front that would be factored in to any offer.

Basically yes, the sticking point being your bank would need to be happy with that and have no concerns about the new owner suddenly stopping payments.

With everything we've had to learn about we must have the most intelligent fans in the country!

The leap to £14m was around double the previous year wasn't it? rom memory the Rioch staged 12 matches in the Olympics but 8 of those were double headers so in reality 8 event days. Seem to recall the total attendance was in the region of 150K. If you average it out you're talking about the...

What response did that get from ML?